Elsayed Yasser N, Fraser Debbie
Neonatal Netw. 2017 Sep 1;36(5):265-272. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.36.5.265.
The clinical guidelines for treating patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) have significantly evolved over the last decades from treating any ductal shunt to more conservative management where only the hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (HSPDA) is treated. This shift has resulted largely from a lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting a relationship between treating a PDA and improving long-term neonatal outcomes. However, there are many unresolved issues. There is no consensus on the precise definition of HSPDA requiring treatment or a clear understanding of when to treat HSPDA. Moreover, the current evidence shows worsening of the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome for infants undergoing surgical PDA ligation.
The presence of physiologic variability among preterm infants, and the presence of different compensatory mechanisms may make it difficult to establish a link between pathophysiology and long-term outcomes. That is, the physiologic variability cannot be simply assessed by randomly assigning infants into two arms of a study. Relying on research from animal and human studies, this article explains the link between the pathophysiology of a PDA and neonatal outcomes.
在过去几十年中,治疗动脉导管未闭(PDA)的临床指南发生了显著演变,从治疗任何导管分流转变为更为保守的管理方式,即仅治疗血流动力学显著的动脉导管未闭(HSPDA)。这种转变主要是由于缺乏随机对照试验的证据支持治疗PDA与改善新生儿长期预后之间的关系。然而,仍有许多未解决的问题。对于需要治疗的HSPDA的精确定义以及何时治疗HSPDA,目前尚无共识。此外,现有证据表明,接受动脉导管未闭手术结扎的婴儿的长期神经发育预后会恶化。
早产儿存在生理变异性,且存在不同的代偿机制,这可能使得难以确定病理生理学与长期预后之间的联系。也就是说,不能简单地通过将婴儿随机分为研究的两组来评估生理变异性。本文依托动物和人体研究,阐述了动脉导管未闭的病理生理学与新生儿预后之间的联系。