Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;67(2):363-368. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.094. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
Since thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of descending thoracic aneurysms in March 2005, excellent 30-day and midterm outcomes have been described. However, data on long-term outcomes are lacking with Medicare data suggesting that TEVAR has worse late survival compared with open descending repair. As such, the purpose of this study was to examine the long-term outcomes for on-label use of TEVAR for repair of descending thoracic aneurysms.
Of 579 patients undergoing TEVAR between March 2005 and April 2016 at a single referral center for aortic surgery, 192 (33.2%) were performed for a descending thoracic aneurysm indication in accordance with the device instructions for use, including 106 fusiform (55.2%), 80 saccular (41.7%), and 6 with both saccular and fusiform (3.1%) aneurysms. All aneurysms were located distal to the left subclavian artery and proximal to the celiac axis, and hybrid procedures including arch or visceral debranching were excluded with the exception of left carotid-subclavian artery bypass. Aortic dissection and intramural hematoma as indications for TEVAR were also excluded. Primary 30-day and in-hospital outcomes included mortality, stroke, need for new permanent dialysis, and permanent paraparesis or paraplegia. Primary long-term outcomes included survival and rate of reintervention secondary to endoleak. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate long-term overall and aorta-specific survivals.
The mean age was 71.1 ± 10.4 years. All aneurysms in this series were degenerative in nature and no patients with a connective tissue disorder were included. The mean aortic diameter was 5.9 ± 1.5 cm at time of intervention. Rates of 30-day and in-hospital mortality, stroke, permanent dialysis, and permanent paraparesis and paraplegia were 4.7%, 2.1%, 0.5%, and 0.5%, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 69 ± 44 months (range, 3-141 months), there were 68 late deaths (35.4%), two of which were due to aortic rupture. Overall and aorta-specific survivals at 141 months (11.8 years) were 45.7% and 96.2%, respectively. Endovascular reintervention was required in 14 patients (7.3%) owing to type I (n = 10), type II (n = 2), and type III (n = 2) endoleak, all of which subsequently resolved. No patient required open reintervention for any cause.
Long-term (12-year) aorta-specific survival after on-label endovascular repair of degenerative descending thoracic aneurysms in nonsyndromic patients is excellent (96%) with sustained protection from rupture, and a low rate of reintervention owing to endoleak (7%). Endovascular repair should be considered the treatment of choice for this pathology.
自 2005 年 3 月胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)获得美国食品和药物管理局批准用于治疗降主动脉瘤以来,其 30 天和中期结果一直非常出色。然而,由于医疗保险数据表明 TEVAR 的晚期生存率比开放降主动脉修复差,因此缺乏长期结果数据。因此,本研究的目的是检查 TEVAR 用于治疗降主动脉瘤的标签使用的长期结果。
在一家主动脉外科转诊中心,于 2005 年 3 月至 2016 年 4 月期间进行了 579 例 TEVAR,其中 192 例(33.2%)符合设备使用说明,用于治疗降主动脉瘤,包括 106 例梭形(55.2%)、80 例囊状(41.7%)和 6 例囊状和梭形(3.1%)动脉瘤。所有动脉瘤均位于左锁骨下动脉远端和腹腔干近端,排除了包括弓或内脏分支在内的杂交手术,除非进行了左侧颈总动脉-锁骨下动脉旁路术。也排除了 TEVAR 的主动脉夹层和壁内血肿适应证。30 天和住院期间的主要结局包括死亡率、中风、需要新的永久性透析和永久性截瘫或四肢瘫痪。主要的长期结局包括因内漏而再次干预的生存和发生率。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计长期总体和主动脉特异性生存率。
平均年龄为 71.1±10.4 岁。本系列中的所有动脉瘤均为退行性,不包括任何患有结缔组织疾病的患者。介入时的平均主动脉直径为 5.9±1.5cm。30 天和住院死亡率、中风、永久性透析和永久性截瘫或四肢瘫痪的发生率分别为 4.7%、2.1%、0.5%和 0.5%。在平均 69±44 个月(3-141 个月)的随访中,有 68 例晚期死亡(35.4%),其中 2 例死于主动脉破裂。141 个月(11.8 年)时的总体生存率和主动脉特异性生存率分别为 45.7%和 96.2%。由于 type I(n=10)、type II(n=2)和 type III(n=2)内漏,14 名患者(7.3%)需要进行血管内再干预,所有这些内漏均随后得到解决。没有患者因任何原因需要开放再干预。
在非综合征患者中,退行性降主动脉瘤的标签内血管修复后 12 年的长期(12 年)主动脉特异性生存率非常出色(96%),具有持续的破裂保护作用,内漏再干预率较低(7%)。血管内修复应被视为该病变的治疗选择。