Consumer Safety Institute (VeiligheidNL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Collaboration on Health and Safety in Sports, Department of Public & Occupational Health and Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Inj Prev. 2018 Jun;24(3):205-212. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042179. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
Helmet use in Dutch recreational skiers and snowboarders (DRSS) remains low. This study evaluated the effects of exposure to a nationwide intervention on relevant determinants of helmet use and helmet use in DRSS.
The intervention mapping protocol was used to develop an in-season intervention programme targeted at adult DRSS. A prospective single-cohort study was conducted to evaluate the impact of intervention exposure on determinants of helmet use (ie, knowledge about head injury risk and preventive measures, risk perception, attitudes to head injury risk and helmet use and intention to helmet use) and self-reported helmet use. A random sample of 363 DRSS from an existing panel participated in this study. Data were collected using online questionnaires before and immediately after the 2010/2011 intervention season. In a separate sample of 363 DRSS, intervention reach was assessed after the 2010/2011 season.
Overall, no significant associations were found between intervention exposure and the determinants of helmet use. However, subgroup analyses revealed intervention effects on risk perception and knowledge in specific subpopulations. Intervention exposure had a significant, positive effect on helmet use in DRSS (β=0.23; 95% CI 0.017 to 0.44). Subgroup analyses revealed that this effect was found in: (1) skiers, (2) female DRSS, (3) young skiers and (4) intermediate skiers. Overall, intervention reach was 28.1%, with differences found between skiers and snowboarders.
Exposure to a nationwide intervention programme was associated with increased self-reported helmet use in DRSS. Differences were found in intervention effectiveness and reach between subpopulations. These differences must be taken into account when developing and evaluating future interventions.
荷兰休闲滑雪者和单板滑雪者(DRSS)的头盔使用率仍然较低。本研究评估了暴露于全国性干预措施对头盔使用相关决定因素和 DRSS 中头盔使用的影响。
使用干预映射协议为成年 DRSS 制定了一个季节性干预计划。进行了一项前瞻性单队列研究,以评估干预暴露对头盔使用决定因素(即头部受伤风险和预防措施的知识、风险感知、对头部受伤风险和头盔使用的态度以及使用头盔的意图)和自我报告的头盔使用的影响。从现有的小组中随机抽取了 363 名 DRSS 参与了这项研究。在 2010/2011 年干预季节之前和之后,使用在线问卷收集数据。在 363 名 DRSS 的单独样本中,在 2010/2011 年赛季后评估了干预的覆盖率。
总体而言,干预暴露与头盔使用的决定因素之间没有发现显著的关联。然而,亚组分析显示,特定亚人群的风险感知和知识方面存在干预效果。干预暴露对 DRSS 中的头盔使用有显著的积极影响(β=0.23;95%CI 0.017 至 0.44)。亚组分析显示,这种效果存在于:(1)滑雪者,(2)女性 DRSS,(3)年轻的滑雪者和(4)中级滑雪者。总体而言,干预的覆盖率为 28.1%,滑雪者和单板滑雪者之间存在差异。
暴露于全国性的干预计划与 DRSS 中自我报告的头盔使用率增加有关。在亚人群中,干预效果和覆盖率存在差异。在制定和评估未来的干预措施时,必须考虑这些差异。