• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

臀位外倒转术成功后47例分娩与头先露自然分娩7456例的母儿结局比较。

Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.

作者信息

de Gregorio Nikolaus, Friedl Thomas, Schramm Amelie, Reister Frank, Janni Wolfgang, Ebner Florian

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(5):477-481. doi: 10.1159/000480013. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1159/000480013
PMID:28848185
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Achieving a cephalic position after a successful external cephalic version (ECV) is desired to result in delivery and fetal outcomes that are similar to those of deliveries following spontaneous cephalic presentation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients with successful ECV following fetal breech position (ECV cohort, n = 47) or with a singleton spontaneous cephalic pregnancy at ≥37 weeks of gestational age (control group, n = 7,456) attempting a vaginal delivery between 2010 and 2013 at the University Hospital Ulm. The mode of delivery and fetal outcome parameters were compared between these 2 groups using nonparametric statistics.

RESULTS

ECV cohort and control group did not differ with respect to maternal age, parity, gestational age at birth, and fetal gender. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to all parameters indicating fetal outcome. However, the rate of cesarean sections was higher after successful ECV compared to spontaneous cephalic presentation (27.7 vs. 12.8%, OR 2.615).

CONCLUSION

While vaginal delivery is less likely to happen after a successful ECV compared to spontaneous cephalic singleton pregnancies, fetal outcome parameters showed no difference between the 2 groups. Physicians should be counseling and encouraging women to attempt ECV, as it is a safe and effective procedure.

摘要

背景

成功实施外倒转术(ECV)后实现头先露,有望获得与自然头先露分娩相似的分娩方式及胎儿结局。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入2010年至2013年在乌尔姆大学医院尝试经阴道分娩的胎儿臀位成功实施ECV的患者(ECV队列,n = 47)或孕龄≥37周的单胎自然头先露妊娠患者(对照组,n = 7456)。使用非参数统计方法比较这两组的分娩方式和胎儿结局参数。

结果

ECV队列和对照组在产妇年龄、产次、出生时孕周及胎儿性别方面无差异。两组在所有表明胎儿结局的参数方面均无显著差异。然而,与自然头先露相比,成功实施ECV后的剖宫产率更高(27.7% 对12.8%,OR 2.615)。

结论

与单胎自然头先露妊娠相比,成功实施ECV后经阴道分娩的可能性较小,但两组的胎儿结局参数无差异。医生应向女性提供咨询并鼓励她们尝试ECV,因为这是一种安全有效的方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.臀位外倒转术成功后47例分娩与头先露自然分娩7456例的母儿结局比较。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(5):477-481. doi: 10.1159/000480013. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
2
Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for caesarean section during trial of labor - a matched controlled study.成功的外倒转术是试产期间剖宫产的独立因素——一项配对对照研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec;46(10):737-742. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
3
Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls.外倒转术失败后的产科及新生儿结局:失败组、成功组与对照组的分层分析
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Mar;28(5):605-10. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.927429. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
4
Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.2002-2012 年澳大利亚人群研究:足月臀位行外倒转术的情况。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 26;17(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1430-5.
5
[Impact of the external cephalic version on the obstetrical prognosis in a team with a high success rate of vaginal delivery in breech presentation].[外倒转术对臀位阴道分娩成功率高的团队中产科预后的影响]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Oct;45(8):859-865. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
6
Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.外倒转术(ECV)试验后的分娩方式和新生儿结局:阴道臀位与头位分娩的前瞻性试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Apr;287(4):663-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2639-1. Epub 2012 Nov 25.
7
Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version: comparison with spontaneous cephalic presentations at delivery.成功实施外倒转术后的分娩方式:与分娩时自然头位的比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Oct;35(10):883-888. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30809-4.
8
Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation.35-37 孕周常规超声检查在诊断非头位中的价值。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;55(2):248-256. doi: 10.1002/uog.21902.
9
Management of breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience.足月臀先露的管理:一项基于10年经验的回顾性队列研究。
J Perinatol. 2015 Oct;35(10):803-8. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.75. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
10
Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.奥克兰外倒转术的应用取得了成功,但存在局限性。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Oct;48(5):467-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00889.x.