Calle Rubio Myriam, Casamor Ricard, Miravitlles Marc
Pulmonary Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos.
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Complutense of Madrid, Research Institute of Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Aug 9;12:2373-2383. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S137872. eCollection 2017.
The Spanish Guidelines for COPD (GesEPOC) describe four clinical phenotypes: non-exacerbator (NE), asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACO), frequent exacerbator with emphysema (EE), and exacerbator with chronic bronchitis (ECB). The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of COPD phenotypes, their clinical characteristics, and the availability of diagnostic tools to classify COPD phenotypes in clinical practice.
This study was an epidemiological, cross-sectional, and multi-centered study. Patients ≥40 years old with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV)/forced vital capacity ratio of <0.7 and who were smokers or former smokers (with at least 10 pack-years) were included. The availability of diagnostic tools to classify COPD phenotypes was assessed by an ad hoc questionnaire.
A total of 647 patients (294 primary care [PC], 353 pulmonology centers) were included. Most patients were male (80.8%), with a mean age (SD) of 68.2 (9.2) years, mean post-bronchodilator FEV was 53.2% (18.9%) and they suffered a mean of 2.2 (2.1) exacerbations in the last year. NE was the most frequent phenotype (47.5%) found, followed by ECB (29.1%), EE (17.0%), and ACO (6.5%). Significant differences between the four phenotypes were found regarding age; sex; body mass index; FEV; body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity (BODE)/body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea and exacerbations (BODEx) index; modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale; respiratory symptoms; comorbidi-ties; hospitalizations; and exacerbations in the last year. Physicians considered that >80% of the diagnostic tools needed to classify COPD phenotypes were available, with the exception of computed tomography (26.9%) and carbon monoxide transfer test (13.5%) in PC, and sputum eosinophilia count in PC and pulmonology centers (40.4% and 49.4%, respectively).
In Spanish clinical practice, almost half of the patients with COPD presented with NE phenotype. The prevalence of ACO according to the Spanish consensus definition was very low. In general, physicians indicated that they had the necessary tools for diagnosing COPD phenotypes.
西班牙慢性阻塞性肺疾病指南(GesEPOC)描述了四种临床表型:非加重型(NE)、哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠综合征(ACO)、伴有肺气肿的频繁加重型(EE)和伴有慢性支气管炎的加重型(ECB)。本研究的目的是确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病表型的频率、其临床特征以及在临床实践中用于分类慢性阻塞性肺疾病表型的诊断工具的可用性。
本研究为一项流行病学、横断面、多中心研究。纳入年龄≥40岁、支气管扩张剂后1秒用力呼气容积(FEV)/用力肺活量比值<0.7且为吸烟者或既往吸烟者(至少10包年)的患者。通过一份专门设计的问卷评估用于分类慢性阻塞性肺疾病表型的诊断工具的可用性。
共纳入647例患者(294例来自基层医疗[PC]机构,353例来自肺病中心)。大多数患者为男性(80.8%),平均年龄(标准差)为68.2(9.2)岁,支气管扩张剂后平均FEV为53.2%(18.9%),且他们在过去一年中平均经历2.2(2.1)次加重。发现NE是最常见的表型(47.5%),其次是ECB(29.1%)、EE(17.0%)和ACO(6.5%)。在年龄、性别、体重指数、FEV、体重指数、气流受限、呼吸困难和运动能力(BODE)/体重指数、气流受限、呼吸困难和加重(BODEx)指数、改良医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表、呼吸道症状、合并症、住院情况以及过去一年的加重情况等方面,四种表型之间存在显著差异。医生认为,除了基层医疗机构中计算机断层扫描(26.9%)和一氧化碳弥散试验(13.5%)以及基层医疗机构和肺病中心的痰液嗜酸性粒细胞计数(分别为40.4%和49.4%)外,>80%的用于分类慢性阻塞性肺疾病表型所需的诊断工具是可用的。
在西班牙的临床实践中,几乎一半的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者表现为NE表型。根据西班牙共识定义,ACO的患病率非常低。总体而言,医生表示他们拥有诊断慢性阻塞性肺疾病表型所需的工具。