Suppr超能文献

使用共悬浮™给药技术的定量吸入器递送的富马酸福莫特罗与奥克斯都保®治疗中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效比较:一项随机、剂量范围研究。

Efficacy of Formoterol Fumarate Delivered by Metered Dose Inhaler Using Co-Suspension™ Delivery Technology Versus Foradil® Aerolizer® in Moderate-To-Severe COPD: A Randomized, Dose-Ranging Study.

作者信息

Sethi Sanjay, Fogarty Charles, Hanania Nicola A, Martinez Fernando J, Rennard Stephen, Fries Michael, Orevillo Chad, Darken Patrick, St Rose Earl, Strom Shannon, Fischer Tracy, Golden Michael, Dwivedi Sarvajna, Reisner Colin

机构信息

Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo.

Spartanburg Medical Research, Spartanburg, South Carolina.

出版信息

Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016 Nov 17;4(1):21-33. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.4.1.2016.0158.

Abstract

Co-Suspension™ Delivery Technology offers a novel pharmaceutical platform for inhaled drug therapy. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study (NCT01349868) evaluated the efficacy of a range of doses for formoterol fumarate (FF) delivered using Co-Suspension delivery technology via a pressurized metered dose inhaler (MDI) versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Secondary objectives included determination of non-inferior efficacy and systemic exposure compared with open-label Foradil 12 μg (Foradil Aerolizer; formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler). Patients received each of the 6 study treatments (FF MDI [7.2, 9.6 and 19.2μg], placebo MDI and open-label Foradil [12 and 24µg]), separated by 3-10 days. Spirometry was performed 60 and 30 minutes prior to and at regular intervals up to 12 hours post-administration of study drug. The primary outcome measure was the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) area under the curve between 0 and 12 hours (AUC) relative to test day baseline. A total of 50 patients were randomized to study treatment sequences. All doses of FF MDI demonstrated superiority to placebo (<0.0001) and non-inferiority to Foradil 12μg, on bronchodilator outcome measures. No serious adverse events were reported during the study. This study demonstrates non-inferiority of bronchodilator response and bioequivalent exposure of FF MDI 9.6μg to Foradil 12μg, with both agents exhibiting a similar safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. This study supports the selection of FF MDI 9.6µg for further evaluation in Phase III trials.

摘要

共悬浮™给药技术为吸入药物治疗提供了一个新型药物平台。这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、单剂量研究(NCT01349868)评估了使用共悬浮给药技术通过压力定量吸入器(MDI)递送的一系列剂量的富马酸福莫特罗(FF)与安慰剂相比,在中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的疗效。次要目标包括确定与开放标签的福达适12μg(福达适气雾剂;富马酸福莫特罗干粉吸入器)相比的非劣效性疗效和全身暴露量。患者接受6种研究治疗(FF MDI[7.2、9.6和19.2μg]、安慰剂MDI和开放标签的福达适[12和24μg])中的每一种,间隔3至10天。在给予研究药物前60分钟和30分钟以及给药后直至12小时定期进行肺活量测定。主要结局指标是相对于试验日基线,0至12小时曲线下1秒用力呼气量(FEV)的变化(AUC)。共有50名患者被随机分配到研究治疗序列。在支气管扩张剂结局指标上,所有剂量的FF MDI均显示优于安慰剂(<0.0001)且不劣于福达适12μg。研究期间未报告严重不良事件。这项研究证明了FF MDI 9.6μg在支气管扩张剂反应方面的非劣效性以及与福达适12μg的生物等效暴露量,两种药物在中重度COPD患者中均表现出相似的安全性。这项研究支持选择FF MDI 9.6μg进行III期试验的进一步评估。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Importance of inhaler devices in the management of airway disease.吸入装置在气道疾病管理中的重要性。
Respir Med. 2008 Jan;102(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.07.031. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
9
Standardisation of spirometry.肺活量测定法的标准化
Eur Respir J. 2005 Aug;26(2):319-38. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验