Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)试验中作为健康状况治疗反应决定因素的社会经济地位

Socioeconomic Status as a Determinant of Health Status Treatment Response in COPD Trials.

作者信息

Jones Paul W, Gelhorn Heather, Wilson Hilary, Benson Victoria S, Karlsson Niklas, Menjoge Shailendra, Müllerova Hana, Rennard Stephen I, Tal-Singer Ruth, Merrill Debora, Tabberer Maggie

机构信息

Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, United Kingdom.

Evidera, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2017 Apr 1;4(2):150-158. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.4.2.2017.0132.

Abstract

: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often recruit patients from low and high socioeconomic status (SES) countries, but little is known about the effect of SES on clinical outcomes, particularly patient-centered measures of symptomatic benefit. : Combined individual chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patient data from the placebo and long-acting bronchodilator arms of 17 RCTs (from the COPD Biomarkers Qualification Consortium database) were analyzed. Health status was measured using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (minimum clinically important difference [MCID]: 4 units). Trials were grouped into short-term (≤12 months) and medium-term (>12 months to 48 months). A participant's country of residence was categorized into Low/Medium or High SES using World Health Organization criteria. : Data from 19765 individuals (6109 Low/Medium SES) were available. Patients in Low/Medium SES countries had more severe disease at baseline. Improvement in SGRQ score with placebo was ≈2 units greater in Low/Medium than in High SES countries; at its greatest, the improvement from baseline exceeded the MCID in Low/Medium countries. This difference was maintained for at least 1 year. Improvement with bronchodilator was also greater in Low/Medium versus High SES countries; overall there was no evidence that the treatment effect versus placebo was different between countries of different SES status. : Participants in Low/Medium SES countries experienced significantly larger treatment effects, irrespective of treatment group (placebo and bronchodilator). Despite this, COPD patients in Low/Medium SES countries experienced a health status gain from long-acting bronchodilator treatment that is similar to that seen in High SES countries.

摘要

随机对照试验(RCT)通常从社会经济地位(SES)低和高的国家招募患者,但对于SES对临床结局的影响,尤其是以患者为中心的症状改善指标,了解甚少。分析了17项随机对照试验(来自慢性阻塞性肺疾病生物标志物资格认证联盟数据库)中安慰剂组和长效支气管扩张剂组的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者个体合并数据。使用圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)测量健康状况(最小临床重要差异[MCID]:4分)。试验分为短期(≤12个月)和中期(>12个月至48个月)。根据世界卫生组织标准,将参与者的居住国分为低/中等或高SES。有19765名个体(6109名低/中等SES)的数据可用。低/中等SES国家的患者在基线时疾病更严重。低/中等SES国家安慰剂组SGRQ评分的改善比高SES国家大约多2分;在低/中等国家,从基线开始的最大改善超过了MCID。这种差异至少维持了1年。低/中等SES国家使用支气管扩张剂的改善也大于高SES国家;总体而言,没有证据表明不同SES状态国家之间与安慰剂相比的治疗效果存在差异。低/中等SES国家的参与者无论治疗组(安慰剂和支气管扩张剂)如何,都经历了明显更大的治疗效果。尽管如此,低/中等SES国家的COPD患者通过长效支气管扩张剂治疗获得的健康状况改善与高SES国家相似。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Status as a Determinant of Health Status Treatment Response in COPD Trials.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2017 Apr 1;4(2):150-158. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.4.2.2017.0132.
2
Responder Analyses for Treatment Effects in COPD Using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2017 Mar 2;4(2):124-131. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.4.2.2017.0130.
4
Umeclidinium bromide versus placebo for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 20;6(6):CD011897. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011897.pub2.
5
Nutritional supplementation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD000998. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000998.pub3.
10
Baseline health status and setting impacted minimal clinically important differences in COPD: an exploratory study.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;116:49-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

5
The Association Between Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 May 5;15:981-993. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S238933. eCollection 2020.
9
What's New with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire and Why Do We Care?
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2017 Apr 3;4(2):83-86. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.4.2.2017.0139.

本文引用的文献

3
Trends in socioeconomic status-related differences in mortality among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Oct;11(8):1195-202. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201403-094OC.
4
Minimal clinically important differences in pharmacological trials.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb 1;189(3):250-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201310-1863PP.
5
Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):267-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
6
Clinical trials have gone global: is this a good thing?
PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001228. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and socioeconomic status: a systematic review.
COPD. 2012 Jun;9(3):216-26. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2011.648030. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
8
Health status in the TORCH study of COPD: treatment efficacy and other determinants of change.
Respir Res. 2011 May 31;12(1):71. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-71.
9
Bias due to withdrawal in long-term randomised trials in COPD: evidence from the TORCH study.
Clin Respir J. 2011 Jan;5(1):44-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-699X.2010.00198.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验