Heinen Stefan G, de Boer Sanne W, van den Heuvel Daniel A, Huberts Wouter, Dekker Patricia, van de Vosse Frans N, Delhaas Tammo, de Vries Jean-Paul
Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands -
Department of Biomedical Engineering, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands -
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 Feb;59(1):37-44. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.17.10186-2. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
This study evaluated the accuracy of duplex ultrasonography (DUS)-based peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) and ipsilateral common femoral artery (CFA) velocity waveform analysis to identify a hemodynamically significant equivocal iliac artery stenosis (30-75% lumen diameter reduction). Intra-arterial pressure measurements were used as a reference.
In a previously performed prospective study (NTR5085), 30 patients with 35 iliac artery stenoses underwent intra-arterial angiography. To determine the hemodynamic significance of the iliac artery stenoses, intra-arterial translesional pressure measurements were performed under hyperemic conditions. Preprocedural DUS was obtained of the iliac and femoral arteries. PSVR over the iliac lesions was determined, and ipsilateral CFA velocity waveforms were retrospectively classified. The intraobserver and interobserver agreement for CFA velocity waveform classification were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy were calculated by comparing PSVR, velocity waveform analysis, and a combination of these parameters to the intra-arterial translesional pressure gradient. A translesional pressure gradient ≥10 mmHg, PSVR ≥2.5, and a monophasic or biphasic CFA velocity waveform were considered to be indicative for a hemodynamically significant iliac artery stenosis.
For classification of ipsilateral CFA velocity waveforms, intraobserver and interobserver agreement were 0.94 and 0.82, respectively. A PSVR ≥2.5 could identify a hemodynamically significant stenosis with 83% sensitivity, 67% specificity, and an overall accuracy of 77%. When both a monophasic and a biphasic velocity waveform were considered to indicate a hemodynamically significant iliac artery stenosis, sensitivity was 78%, specificity was 50%, and the overall accuracy was 69%. The combination of a PSVR ≥2.5 with either a monophasic or a biphasic CFA velocity waveform was found in 20 stenoses and resulted in 94% sensitivity, 75% specificity, and 90% accuracy. When the remainder of the stenoses (N.=15) was classified by means of the PSVR, the overall accuracy remained 77%.
DUS is a very useful noninvasive imaging modality to determine the significance of an iliac artery stenosis. A combination of translesional PSVR ≥2.5 with either a monophasic or a biphasic ipsilateral CFA ultrasound waveforms has a good accuracy and helps to select patients that benefit most from follow-up examination by computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography.
本研究评估了基于双功超声(DUS)的收缩期峰值速度比(PSVR)和同侧股总动脉(CFA)速度波形分析在识别血流动力学意义不明确的髂动脉狭窄(管腔直径减少30 - 75%)方面的准确性。以动脉内压力测量作为参考。
在先前进行的一项前瞻性研究(NTR5085)中,30例患有35处髂动脉狭窄的患者接受了动脉内血管造影。为确定髂动脉狭窄的血流动力学意义,在充血状态下进行动脉内跨病变压力测量。术前获取髂动脉和股动脉的DUS图像。测定髂动脉病变处的PSVR,并对同侧CFA速度波形进行回顾性分类。评估观察者内和观察者间对CFA速度波形分类的一致性。通过将PSVR、速度波形分析以及这些参数的组合与动脉内跨病变压力梯度进行比较,计算敏感性、特异性和总体准确性。跨病变压力梯度≥10 mmHg、PSVR≥2.5以及单相或双相CFA速度波形被认为提示血流动力学意义显著的髂动脉狭窄。
对于同侧CFA速度波形的分类,观察者内和观察者间一致性分别为0.94和0.82。PSVR≥2.5可识别血流动力学意义显著的狭窄,敏感性为83%,特异性为67%,总体准确性为77%。当单相和双相速度波形均被认为提示血流动力学意义显著的髂动脉狭窄时,敏感性为78%,特异性为50%,总体准确性为69%。在20处狭窄中发现PSVR≥2.5与单相或双相CFA速度波形的组合,其敏感性为94%,特异性为75%,准确性为90%。当其余15处狭窄通过PSVR进行分类时,总体准确性仍为77%。
DUS是确定髂动脉狭窄意义的一种非常有用的无创成像方法。跨病变PSVR≥2.5与同侧CFA单相或双相超声波形的组合具有良好的准确性,有助于选择能从计算机断层血管造影或磁共振血管造影随访检查中获益最大的患者。