Andersson Viveka, Bergman Stefan, Henoch Ingela, Ene Kerstin Wickström, Otterström-Rydberg Eva, Simonsson Hanna, Ahlberg Karin
The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenborg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Medicine, Hallands Hospital Varberg, Träslövsvägen 68, 432 37, Varberg, Sweden.
Scand J Pain. 2017 Apr;15:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
Studies have shown that pain is common among hospitalized patients and that there is a lack of compliance with pain management guidelines. Improving pain management does not only involve developing new drugs or technology; even more important is an effective organisation that utilises existing expertise. The aim of this study was to investigate whether pain in hospitalized patients can be reduced by implementing evidence-based pain management guidelines, providing education for staff and an organisation that includes pain responsibility nurses.
A cross-sectional study was carried out between 2009 and 2010 at two hospitals in southwest Sweden, comprising a baseline survey followed by an intervention. The study involved 306 patients, who answered questions about pain intensity at rest and while moving, disturbed sleep due to pain and whether they had used a pain rating scale while in hospital. Medical records were scrutinised for analgesic prescriptions. An intervention then took place, involving implementation of evidence-based guidelines, staff education and the introduction of pain responsibility nurses. A follow-up survey was carried out in 2012, in which 293 patients answered the same questions and their medical records were also reviewed. The baseline results were then compared with those of the follow-up survey.
When compared with the baseline survey, the follow-up survey revealed significant differences in the use of validated pain rating instruments as well as the prescription of more appropriate analgesics. Prescription of paracetamol increased significantly in the follow-up survey; 56% of the patients were prescribed paracetamol on a regular basis, compared with 42% at baseline. There was also a significant increase in the use of strong opioids, from 38% at baseline to 55% at follow-up. Prescriptions of weak opioids decreased from 16% at baseline to 4% at follow-up. No significant differences were observed in patient pain levels in the follow-up survey. At baseline, 29% of the patients reported moderate to severe pain at rest (NRS 4-10) and at follow-up that figure was 24% (NRS 4-10). In both surveys, 41% reported moderate to severe pain (NRS 5-10) during movement. Thirty-nine percent reported disturbed sleep at night at both baseline and follow-up.
This study demonstrates that evidence-based guidelines made accessible to all staff as a pocket size booklet and on the intranet, in combination with staff education, pain responsibility nurses who informed other staff on their own wards, improved the prescription of analgesics in the hospitals studied. In order to achieve a noticeable effect for patients, i.e., reduced pain levels, an intervention containing more components than those employed in the present study is required.
Nurses and physicians need greater knowledge about the importance of pain rating. A vital part of pain management at hospitals is continuous evaluation of treatment outcomes to prevent severe pain and disturbed sleep. The complexity of pain and pain management requires commitment, time and knowledge on the part of healthcare staff. Multi-professional pain teams that support ward staff in pain management are necessary in order to reduce suffering and unnecessary pain in hospitalized patients.
研究表明,疼痛在住院患者中很常见,且疼痛管理指南的依从性不足。改善疼痛管理不仅涉及开发新药或新技术;更重要的是建立一个能有效利用现有专业知识的组织。本研究的目的是调查通过实施循证疼痛管理指南、对医护人员进行教育以及建立包含疼痛责任护士的组织,是否能减轻住院患者的疼痛。
2009年至2010年在瑞典西南部的两家医院开展了一项横断面研究,包括基线调查及后续干预。该研究纳入了306名患者,他们回答了关于静息及活动时疼痛强度、因疼痛导致睡眠受扰以及住院期间是否使用疼痛评分量表的问题。仔细查阅病历以获取镇痛药物处方信息。随后进行了干预,包括实施循证指南、医护人员教育以及引入疼痛责任护士。2012年进行了随访调查,293名患者回答了相同问题,同时也查阅了他们的病历。将基线结果与随访调查结果进行比较。
与基线调查相比,随访调查显示在有效疼痛评分工具的使用以及更合适的镇痛药处方方面存在显著差异。对乙酰氨基酚的处方在随访调查中显著增加;56%的患者定期使用对乙酰氨基酚,而基线时为42%。强效阿片类药物的使用也显著增加,从基线时的38%增至随访时的55%。弱阿片类药物的处方从基线时的16%降至随访时的4%。随访调查中患者的疼痛水平未观察到显著差异。基线时,29%的患者报告静息时中度至重度疼痛(数字评分法4 - 10分),随访时该比例为24%(数字评分法4 - 10分)。在两项调查中,41%的患者报告活动时中度至重度疼痛(数字评分法5 - 10分)。基线和随访时均有39%的患者报告夜间睡眠受扰。
本研究表明,以袖珍手册形式并在内部网上向所有医护人员提供循证指南,结合医护人员教育以及由疼痛责任护士向本病房其他人员传达信息,改善了所研究医院的镇痛药处方情况。为了给患者带来显著效果,即降低疼痛水平,需要一种比本研究中所采用的包含更多组成部分的干预措施。
护士和医生需要更多关于疼痛评分重要性的知识。医院疼痛管理的一个关键部分是持续评估治疗效果,以预防严重疼痛和睡眠受扰。疼痛及疼痛管理的复杂性要求医护人员投入精力、时间并具备相关知识。为了减轻住院患者的痛苦和不必要的疼痛,有必要建立多专业疼痛团队来支持病房医护人员进行疼痛管理。