Schliessbach Jürg, Siegenthaler Andreas, Bütikofer Lukas, Vuilleumier Pascal, Jüni Peter, Arendt-Nielsen Lars, Curatolo Michele
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Chronic Pain Management, Lindenhof Hospital, Lindenhof Group Bern, Switzerland.
Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
Quantitative sensory tests (QST) can be used for profiling anti-nociceptive effects of analgesics. However, anti-nociceptive effects detected by QST are not necessarily associated with analgesic effects in pain patients. As part of a large investigation on low back pain, this paper describes the immediate analgesic and anti-nociceptive effects of oxycodone in chronic low-back pain and ranks different QST according to their ability to reflect this effect. The results are expected to support the selection of QST for future studies on potential novel opioid agonists in human pain.
In this randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blinded cross-over study, 50 patients with chronic low-back pain received a single oral dose of oxycodone 15mg or active placebo, and underwent multiple QST testing. The intensity of low-back pain was recorded during 2h. The areas under the ROC curves and 95% confidence intervals were determined, whereby responder status (≥30% pain reduction) was set as reference variable and changes in QST from baseline were set as classifiers.
Significant analgesic effect on low-back pain as well as anti-nociceptive effects for almost all QST parameters were observed. The QST with the highest area under the curve were heat pain detection threshold (0.65, 95%-CI 0.46 to 0.83), single-stimulus electrical pain threshold (0.64, 95%-CI 0.47 to 0.80) and pressure pain detection threshold (0.63, 95%-CI 0.48 to 0.79).
The results suggest that anti-nociceptive effects assessed by QST fairly reflect clinical efficacy of oxycodone on low-back pain. Pressure pain detection threshold, heat pain detection threshold and single-stimulus electrical pain threshold may be more suitable to sort out potential non-responders rather than identifying potential responders to opioid medication. Future pre-clinical human research may consider these results when investigating the analgesic effect of opioid agonists by means of QST.
定量感觉测试(QST)可用于分析镇痛药的抗伤害感受作用。然而,通过QST检测到的抗伤害感受作用不一定与疼痛患者的镇痛效果相关。作为一项关于腰痛的大型研究的一部分,本文描述了羟考酮对慢性腰痛的即时镇痛和抗伤害感受作用,并根据不同QST反映这种作用的能力对其进行排名。研究结果有望为未来人类疼痛中潜在新型阿片类激动剂的研究选择QST提供支持。
在这项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲交叉研究中,50例慢性腰痛患者接受单次口服15mg羟考酮或活性安慰剂,并进行多次QST测试。在2小时内记录腰痛强度。确定ROC曲线下面积和95%置信区间,将反应者状态(疼痛减轻≥30%)作为参考变量,将QST相对于基线的变化作为分类器。
观察到对腰痛有显著的镇痛作用以及几乎所有QST参数的抗伤害感受作用。曲线下面积最高的QST是热痛检测阈值(0.65,95%置信区间0.46至0.83)、单刺激电痛阈值(0.64,95%置信区间0.47至0.80)和压力痛检测阈值(0.63,95%置信区间0.48至0.79)。
结果表明,通过QST评估的抗伤害感受作用能较好地反映羟考酮对腰痛的临床疗效。压力痛检测阈值、热痛检测阈值和单刺激电痛阈值可能更适合筛选潜在的无反应者,而不是识别阿片类药物的潜在反应者。未来临床前人体研究在通过QST研究阿片类激动剂的镇痛作用时可考虑这些结果。