Suppr超能文献

医院环境下的术后疼痛记录:专题综述

Postoperative pain documentation in a hospital setting: A topical review.

作者信息

Heikkilä Kristiina, Peltonen Laura-Maria, Salanterä Sanna

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, 20014 University of Turku, Finland.

Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, 20014 University of Turku, Finland; Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20520 Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Pain. 2016 Apr;11:77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.12.010. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Nursing documentation supports continuity of care and provides important means of communication among clinicians. The aim of this topical review was to evaluate the published empirical studies on postoperative pain documentation in a hospital setting.

METHODS

The review was conducted through a systematic search of electronic databases: Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Ovid/Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Library. Ten studies were included. Study designs, documented postoperative pain information, quality of pain documentation, reported quality of postoperative pain management and documentation, and suggestions for future research and practice improvements were extracted from the studies.

RESULTS

The most commonly used study design was a descriptive retrospective patient record review. The most commonly reported types of information were pain assessment, use of pain assessment tools, use of pain management interventions, reassessment, types of analgesics used, demographic information and pain intensity. All ten studies reported that the quality of postoperative pain documentation does not meet acceptable standards and that there is a need for improvement. The studies found that organization of regular pain management education for nurses is important for the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative pain documentation needs to be improved. Regular educational programmes and development of monitoring systems for systematic evaluation of pain documentation are needed. Guidelines and recommendations should be based on the latest research evidence, and systematically implemented into practice.

IMPLICATIONS

Comprehensive auditing tools for evaluation of pain documentation can make quality assessment easier and coherent. Specific and clear documentation guidelines are needed and existing guidelines should be better implemented into practice. There is a need to increase nurses' knowledge of postoperative pain management, assessment and documentation. Studies evaluating effectiveness of high quality pain documentation are required.

摘要

背景与目的

护理记录有助于护理的连续性,并为临床医生之间提供重要的沟通方式。本专题综述的目的是评估已发表的关于医院环境中术后疼痛记录的实证研究。

方法

通过对电子数据库进行系统检索开展本综述:科学网、PubMed/Medline、护理学与健康领域数据库、Embase、Ovid/Medline、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆。纳入了十项研究。从这些研究中提取了研究设计、记录的术后疼痛信息、疼痛记录质量、报告的术后疼痛管理和记录质量,以及对未来研究和实践改进的建议。

结果

最常用的研究设计是描述性回顾性患者记录审查。最常报告的信息类型是疼痛评估、疼痛评估工具的使用、疼痛管理干预措施的使用、重新评估、所用镇痛药的类型、人口统计学信息和疼痛强度。所有十项研究均报告术后疼痛记录质量未达到可接受标准,需要改进。研究发现,为护士组织定期的疼痛管理教育对未来很重要。

结论

术后疼痛记录需要改进。需要开展定期教育项目并开发用于系统评估疼痛记录的监测系统。指南和建议应基于最新研究证据,并系统地应用于实践。

启示

用于评估疼痛记录的综合审计工具可以使质量评估更轻松、更连贯。需要具体、明确的记录指南,现有的指南应更好地应用于实践。有必要增加护士对术后疼痛管理、评估和记录的知识。需要开展评估高质量疼痛记录有效性的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验