School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Marine Scotland Science, Freshwater Fisheries Laboratory, Faskally, Pitlochry PH16 5LB, United Kingdom.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 1;610-611:1375-1389. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.198. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
Climate change is likely to increase summer temperatures in many river environments, raising concerns that this will reduce their thermal suitability for a range of freshwater fish species. As a result, river managers have pursued riparian tree planting due to its ability to moderate stream temperatures by providing shading. However, little is known about the relative ability of different riparian forest types to moderate stream temperatures. Further research is therefore necessary to inform best-practise riparian tree planting strategies. This article contrasts stream temperature and energy fluxes under three riparian vegetation types common to Europe: open grassland terrain (OS), semi-natural deciduous woodland (SNS), and commercial conifer plantation (CS). Data was recorded over the course of a year by weather stations installed in each of the vegetation types. Mean daily stream temperature was generally warmest at OS and coolest at CS. Energy gains at all sites were dominated by shortwave radiation, whereas losses where principally due to longwave and latent heat flux. The magnitude of shortwave radiation received at the water surface was strongly dependent upon vegetation type, with OS and SNS woodland sites receiving approximately 6× and 4× (respectively) the incoming solar radiation of CS. Although CS lost less energy through longwave or latent fluxes than the other sites, net surface heat flux was ordered OS>SNS>CS, mirroring the stream temperature results. These findings demonstrate that energy fluxes at the air-water interface vary substantially between different riparian forest types and that stream temperature response to bankside vegetation depends upon the type of vegetation present. These results present new insights into the conditions under which riparian vegetation shading is optimal for the reduction of surface heat fluxes and have important implications for the development of 'best-practice' tree planting strategies to moderate summer temperature extremes in rivers.
气候变化可能会使许多河流环境的夏季温度升高,这引发了人们的担忧,即这将降低它们对一系列淡水鱼类的热适宜性。因此,河流管理者一直在进行河岸植树,因为它通过提供遮荫来调节溪流温度的能力。然而,对于不同河岸森林类型调节溪流温度的相对能力,人们知之甚少。因此,有必要进行进一步的研究,为最佳实践的河岸植树策略提供信息。本文对比了欧洲常见的三种河岸植被类型下的溪流温度和能量通量:开阔草地地形(OS)、半自然落叶林地(SNS)和商业针叶林种植园(CS)。通过在每种植被类型中安装的气象站,在一年的时间里记录了数据。平均日溪流温度在 OS 处通常最高,在 CS 处最低。所有地点的能量增益主要由短波辐射主导,而损失主要归因于长波和潜热通量。水面接收到的短波辐射量强烈依赖于植被类型,OS 和 SNS 林地的入射太阳辐射分别约为 CS 的 6×和 4×。尽管 CS 通过长波或潜热通量损失的能量比其他地点少,但净表面热通量的顺序为 OS>SNS>CS,与溪流温度结果一致。这些发现表明,空气-水界面的能量通量在不同河岸森林类型之间有很大差异,而河岸植被对溪流温度的响应取决于存在的植被类型。这些结果为了解河岸植被遮荫在减少表面热通量方面的最佳条件提供了新的见解,并对制定“最佳实践”植树策略以缓解河流夏季极端温度具有重要意义。