Lee Yoon Jae, Shin Joon-Shik, Lee Jinho, Kim Me-Riong, Ahn Yong-Jun, Shin Ye-Sle, Park Ki Byung, Shin Byung-Cheul, Lee Myeong Soo, Kim Joo-Hee, Cho Jae-Heung, Ha In-Hyuk
Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, 858 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1942-6.
Considering that large variations exist amongst practitioners in lumbar disorder management and the significant costs that lumbar disorders incur, determining clinical practice patterns to provide preliminary data for standardization should be given higher priority. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is commonly treated using integrative non-surgical methods by Korean medicine doctors (KMDs) in Korea, and this is the first study to assess current Korean medicine practice trends for LSS.
A survey on KMD diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and decision-making in LSS treatment was developed in a 3-step procedure of preliminary drafting, revision based on extramural expert opinion, and final editing. The survey was conducted at the internal conference of a spine-specialty Korean medicine hospital on January 25th, 2015.
The response rate was high at 79.19% (n = 118/149). Participants replied that they treated 7.3 ± 6.8 LSS patients/day using a multimodal treatment method consisting of acupuncture, pharmacopuncture, herbal medicine, Chuna manipulation, and electroacupuncture. Acupuncture mainly used Ashi points and MSAT, and pharmacopuncture mainly Shinbaro solution. The most frequently prescribed herbal medicine was Chungpa-jun, and the most commonly applied Chuna techniques were sidelying lumbar extension dysfunction correction technique, and prone lumbosacral joint distraction method. Radiological findings were mainly referred to for diagnosis, and clinical symptoms, age, radiological findings, and medical history were regarded to be important for prognosis. Participants replied that 7.8 ± 3.3 weeks were required for 50% reduction in pain, and 16.1 ± 7.7 weeks for 80% reduction.
These results suggest that KMDs in Korea combine a conventional approach to LSS and a Korean medicine approach to low back pain for integration of empirical- and evidence-based diagnosis and treatment. The findings may contribute in bridging the divide between evidence and clinical practice guidelines for Korean medicine treatment of LSS and real-world clinical practice in future research.
鉴于腰椎疾病治疗方法在从业者之间存在很大差异,且腰椎疾病产生的费用高昂,确定临床实践模式以提供标准化的初步数据应被给予更高优先级。在韩国,韩医通常采用综合非手术方法治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS),而这是第一项评估韩国目前LSS韩医治疗趋势的研究。
关于韩医对LSS诊断、治疗、预后及决策的调查分三步进行编制,即初稿起草、根据校外专家意见修订以及最终编辑。该调查于2015年1月25日在一家脊柱专科医院的内部会议上进行。
回复率很高,为79.19%(n = 118/149)。参与者表示,他们每天使用包括针灸、药针、草药、整骨推拿和电针在内的多模式治疗方法治疗7.3 ± 6.8例LSS患者。针灸主要使用阿是穴和MSAT,药针主要使用新保溶液。最常开具的草药是仲巴君,最常用的整骨推拿技术是侧卧腰椎伸展功能障碍矫正技术和俯卧腰骶关节牵引法。诊断主要参考影像学检查结果,临床症状、年龄、影像学检查结果和病史被认为对预后很重要。参与者表示,疼痛减轻50%需要7.8 ± 3.3周,疼痛减轻80%需要16.1 ± 7.7周。
这些结果表明,韩国的韩医将传统的LSS治疗方法与韩医治疗腰痛的方法相结合,以实现经验性和循证性诊断与治疗的整合。这些发现可能有助于弥合LSS韩医治疗的证据与临床实践指南之间以及未来研究中的实际临床实践之间的差距。