Harada Taiyo L, Saito Kazuhiro, Araki Yoichi, Matsubayashi Jun, Nagao Toshitaka, Sugimoto Katsutoshi, Tokuuye Koichi
1 Department of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
2 Department of Anatomic Pathology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Acta Radiol. 2018 May;59(5):509-516. doi: 10.1177/0284185117725778. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
Background Recently, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and quantitative enhancement ratio measured at the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been established as an effective method for evaluating liver fibrosis. Purpose To evaluate which is a more favorable surrogate marker in predicting high-stage liver fibrosis, apparently diffusion coefficient (ADC) value or quantitative enhancement ratio measured on HBP. Material and Methods Eighty-three patients with 99 surgically resected hepatic lesions were enrolled in this study. DWI was performed with b-values of 100 and 800 s/mm. Regions of interest were set on ADC map, and the HBP of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, to calculate ADC value, liver-to-muscle ratio (LMR), liver-to-spleen ratio (LSR), and contrast enhancement index (CEI) of liver. We compared these parameters between low-stage fibrosis (F0, F1, and F2) and high-stage fibrosis (F3 and F4). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance when distinguishing low-stage fibrosis from high-stage fibrosis. Results LMR and CEI were significantly lower at high-stage fibrosis than at the low stage ( P < 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively), whereas LSR did not show a significant difference ( P = 0.053). No significant difference was observed in diagnostic performance between LMR and CEI ( P = 0.185). The best sensitivity and specificity, when an LMR of 2.80 or higher was considered to be low-stage fibrosis, were 82.4% and 75.6%, respectively. ADC value showed no significant differences among fibrosis grades ( P = 0.320). Conclusion LMR and CEI were both adequate surrogate parameters to distinguish high-stage fibrosis from low-stage fibrosis.
背景 最近,扩散加权成像(DWI)以及在钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像(MRI)的肝胆期(HBP)测量的定量增强率已被确立为评估肝纤维化的有效方法。目的 评估表观扩散系数(ADC)值或在HBP测量的定量增强率,哪一个是预测高级别肝纤维化更有利的替代标志物。材料与方法 本研究纳入了83例有99个手术切除肝病灶的患者。采用b值为100和800 s/mm²进行DWI。在ADC图和钆塞酸二钠增强MRI的HBP上设置感兴趣区,以计算肝脏的ADC值、肝肌比(LMR)、肝脾比(LSR)和对比增强指数(CEI)。我们比较了低级别纤维化(F0、F1和F2)与高级别纤维化(F3和F4)之间的这些参数。进行了受试者操作特征分析,以比较区分低级别纤维化与高级别纤维化时的诊断性能。结果 高级别纤维化时LMR和CEI显著低于低级别纤维化(分别为P < 0.01和P = 0.04),而LSR无显著差异(P = 0.053)。LMR和CEI在诊断性能上无显著差异(P = 0.185)。当LMR为2.80或更高被认为是低级别纤维化时,最佳敏感性和特异性分别为82.4%和75.6%。ADC值在纤维化分级之间无显著差异(P = 0.320)。结论 LMR和CEI都是区分高级别纤维化与低级别纤维化的合适替代参数。