• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

浪漫欲望是否可预测?应用机器学习分析初始浪漫吸引力

Is Romantic Desire Predictable? Machine Learning Applied to Initial Romantic Attraction.

机构信息

1 Department of Psychology, University of Utah.

2 Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2017 Oct;28(10):1478-1489. doi: 10.1177/0956797617714580. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1177/0956797617714580
PMID:28853645
Abstract

Matchmaking companies and theoretical perspectives on close relationships suggest that initial attraction is, to some extent, a product of two people's self-reported traits and preferences. We used machine learning to test how well such measures predict people's overall tendencies to romantically desire other people (actor variance) and to be desired by other people (partner variance), as well as people's desire for specific partners above and beyond actor and partner variance (relationship variance). In two speed-dating studies, romantically unattached individuals completed more than 100 self-report measures about traits and preferences that past researchers have identified as being relevant to mate selection. Each participant met each opposite-sex participant attending a speed-dating event for a 4-min speed date. Random forests models predicted 4% to 18% of actor variance and 7% to 27% of partner variance; crucially, however, they were unable to predict relationship variance using any combination of traits and preferences reported before the dates. These results suggest that compatibility elements of human mating are challenging to predict before two people meet.

摘要

婚介公司和亲密关系的理论观点表明,最初的吸引力在某种程度上是两个人自我报告的特征和偏好的产物。我们使用机器学习来测试这些措施在多大程度上可以预测人们对他人的总体浪漫欲望(演员方差)和被他人渴望的总体趋势(伴侣方差),以及人们对特定伴侣的渴望,超出演员和伴侣方差(关系方差)。在两项速配研究中,未婚的个体完成了 100 多项关于特征和偏好的自我报告措施,过去的研究人员已经确定这些特征和偏好与择偶有关。每个参与者与参加速配活动的每个异性参与者进行了 4 分钟的速配。随机森林模型预测了演员方差的 4%到 18%和伴侣方差的 7%到 27%;然而,至关重要的是,在约会之前,他们无法使用任何特征和偏好的组合来预测关系方差。这些结果表明,在两个人见面之前,人类交配的兼容性元素很难预测。

相似文献

1
Is Romantic Desire Predictable? Machine Learning Applied to Initial Romantic Attraction.浪漫欲望是否可预测?应用机器学习分析初始浪漫吸引力
Psychol Sci. 2017 Oct;28(10):1478-1489. doi: 10.1177/0956797617714580. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
2
Initial impressions of compatibility and mate value predict later dating and romantic interest.初始的兼容性和伴侣价值印象预测后期的约会和浪漫兴趣。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 8;119(45):e2206925119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206925119. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
3
Hormones in speed-dating: The role of testosterone and cortisol in attraction.速配中的荷尔蒙:睾酮和皮质醇在吸引中的作用。
Horm Behav. 2019 Nov;116:104555. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
4
When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships?何时以及为何理想伴侣偏好会影响开始和维持浪漫关系的过程?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov;101(5):1012-32. doi: 10.1037/a0024062.
5
Mate Preferences for Warmth-Trustworthiness Predict Romantic Attraction in the Early Stages of Mate Selection and Satisfaction in Ongoing Relationships.对温暖-可信赖特质的配偶偏好预示着在配偶选择早期阶段的浪漫吸引力以及恋爱关系中的满意度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Feb;46(2):298-311. doi: 10.1177/0146167219855048. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
6
Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies.机器学习揭示了 43 项纵向夫妻研究中最稳健的关系质量自我报告预测因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):19061-19071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917036117. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
7
Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?重新审视择偶偏好中的性别差异:人们知道自己最初对浪漫伴侣的期望是什么吗?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):245-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245.
8
Blind at First Sight: The Role of Distinctively Accurate and Positive First Impressions in Romantic Interest.一见钟情:独特准确和积极的第一印象在浪漫兴趣中的作用。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jun;31(6):715-728. doi: 10.1177/0956797620919674. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.伴侣偏好确实可以预测选择伴侣的早期阶段的吸引力和选择。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Nov;105(5):757-76. doi: 10.1037/a0033777. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
10
A Comparison of Mate Preferences in Asexual and Allosexual Adults.无性恋者和异性恋者的择偶偏好比较。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jan;53(1):17-24. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02723-2. Epub 2023 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
What values best distinguish the world's cultures? The machine learning-based cultural values inventory.哪些价值观最能区分世界上的各种文化?基于机器学习的文化价值观量表。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Aug 26;4(8):pgaf229. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf229. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Development of a Sexological Ontology.性学本体论的发展。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 30;24(21):6968. doi: 10.3390/s24216968.
3
Stability and Change of Individual Differences in Ideal Partner Preferences Over 13 Years.13 年间理想伴侣偏好的个体差异的稳定性和变化。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Aug;50(8):1263-1279. doi: 10.1177/01461672231164757. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
4
Student adaptation to college and coping in relation to adjustment during COVID-19: A machine learning approach.学生对大学的适应和在 COVID-19 期间的应对与调整的关系:一种机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279711. eCollection 2022.
5
Initial impressions of compatibility and mate value predict later dating and romantic interest.初始的兼容性和伴侣价值印象预测后期的约会和浪漫兴趣。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 8;119(45):e2206925119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206925119. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
6
Simultaneous clustering and variable selection: A novel algorithm and model selection procedure.同时聚类和变量选择:一种新算法和模型选择过程。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Aug;55(5):2157-2174. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01795-7. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
7
The Brain Understands Social Relationships: The Emerging Field of Functional-Connectome-Based Interpersonal Research.大脑理解社会关系:基于功能连接组的人际研究新领域。
Neurosci Insights. 2022 Aug 11;17:26331055221119443. doi: 10.1177/26331055221119443. eCollection 2022.
8
Neural Processing of Facial Attractiveness and Romantic Love: An Overview and Suggestions for Future Empirical Studies.面部吸引力与浪漫爱情的神经处理:综述及对未来实证研究的建议
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 14;13:896514. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896514. eCollection 2022.
9
We Don't Choose Whom We Love: Predictors for Romantic Attraction to Villains.我们无法选择所爱之人:对反派产生浪漫吸引力的预测因素。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 17;13:802988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.802988. eCollection 2022.
10
Is Mate Preference Recognizable Based on Electroencephalogram Signals? Machine Learning Applied to Initial Romantic Attraction.基于脑电图信号能否识别配偶偏好?机器学习应用于最初的浪漫吸引力研究。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 11;16:830820. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.830820. eCollection 2022.