Goetz Matthew P, Suman Vera J, Reid Joel M, Northfelt Don W, Mahr Michael A, Ralya Andrew T, Kuffel Mary, Buhrow Sarah A, Safgren Stephanie L, McGovern Renee M, Black John, Dockter Travis, Haddad Tufia, Erlichman Charles, Adjei Alex A, Visscher Dan, Chalmers Zachary R, Frampton Garrett, Kipp Benjamin R, Liu Minetta C, Hawse John R, Doroshow James H, Collins Jerry M, Streicher Howard, Ames Matthew M, Ingle James N
Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 20;35(30):3391-3400. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.3246. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
Purpose Endoxifen is a tamoxifen metabolite with potent antiestrogenic activity. Patients and Methods We performed a phase I study of oral Z-endoxifen to determine its toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity. Eligibility included endocrine-refractory, estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. An accelerated titration schedule was applied until moderate or dose-limiting toxicity occurred, followed by a 3+3 design and expansion at 40, 80, and 100 mg per day. Tumor DNA from serum (circulating cell free [cf); all patients] and biopsies [160 mg/day and expansion]) was sequenced. Results Of 41 enrolled patients, 38 were evaluable for MTD determination. Prior endocrine regimens during which progression occurred included aromatase inhibitor (n = 36), fulvestrant (n = 21), and tamoxifen (n = 15). Patients received endoxifen once daily at seven dose levels (20 to 160 mg). Dose escalation ceased at 160 mg per day given lack of MTD and endoxifen concentrations > 1,900 ng/mL. Endoxifen clearance was unaffected by CYP2D6 genotype. One patient (60 mg) had cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (pulmonary embolus). Overall clinical benefit rate (stable > 6 months [n = 7] or partial response by RECIST criteria [n = 3]) was 26.3% (95% CI, 13.4% to 43.1%) including prior tamoxifen progression (n = 3). cfDNA mutations were observed in 13 patients ( PIK3CA [n = 8], ESR1 [n = 5], TP53 [n = 4], and AKT [n = 1]) with shorter progression-free survival ( v those without cfDNA mutations; median, 61 v 132 days; log-rank P = .046). Clinical benefit was observed in those with ESR1 amplification (tumor; 80 mg/day) and ESR1 mutation (cfDNA; 160 mg/day). Comparing tumor biopsies and cfDNA, some mutations ( PIK3CA, TP53, and AKT) were undetected by cfDNA, whereas cfDNA mutations ( ESR1, TP53, and AKT) were undetected by biopsy. Conclusion In endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer, Z-endoxifen provides substantial drug exposure unaffected by CYP2D6 metabolism, acceptable toxicity, and promising antitumor activity.
目的 4-羟基他莫昔芬是一种具有强效抗雌激素活性的他莫昔芬代谢产物。患者与方法 我们开展了一项口服Z-4-羟基他莫昔芬的I期研究,以确定其毒性、最大耐受剂量(MTD)、药代动力学和临床活性。入选标准包括内分泌难治性、雌激素受体阳性转移性乳腺癌。采用加速滴定方案,直至出现中度或剂量限制性毒性,随后采用3+3设计,并以每日40、80和100 mg的剂量进行扩展。对血清(循环游离细胞[cf];所有患者)和活检组织(每日160 mg及扩展剂量)中的肿瘤DNA进行测序。结果 在41例入组患者中,38例可评估MTD。疾病进展前的既往内分泌治疗方案包括芳香化酶抑制剂(n = 36)、氟维司群(n = 21)和他莫昔芬(n = 15)。患者在7个剂量水平(20至160 mg)下每日接受一次4-羟基他莫昔芬治疗。由于缺乏MTD且4-羟基他莫昔芬浓度>1900 ng/mL,每日160 mg时停止剂量递增。4-羟基他莫昔芬清除率不受CYP2D6基因型影响。1例患者(60 mg)出现1周期剂量限制性毒性(肺栓塞)。总体临床获益率(稳定>6个月[n = 7]或根据RECIST标准部分缓解[n = 3])为26.3%(95%CI,13.4%至43.1%),包括既往他莫昔芬治疗进展的患者(n = 3)。在13例患者中观察到cfDNA突变(PIK3CA[n = 8]、ESR1[n = 5]、TP53[n = 4]和AKT[n = 1]),这些患者的无进展生存期较短(与无cfDNA突变的患者相比;中位数,61天对132天;对数秩检验P = 0.046)。在ESR1扩增(肿瘤;每日80 mg)和ESR1突变(cfDNA;每日160 mg)的患者中观察到临床获益。比较肿瘤活检组织和cfDNA,cfDNA未检测到一些突变(PIK3CA、TP53和AKT),而活检未检测到cfDNA突变(ESR1、TP53和AKT)。结论 在内分泌难治性转移性乳腺癌中,Z-4-羟基他莫昔芬可提供不受CYP2D6代谢影响的大量药物暴露、可接受的毒性及有前景的抗肿瘤活性。