Suppr超能文献

使用床垫上的脉冲无线电超宽带传感器精确测量胸部按压深度。

Accurate measurement of chest compression depth using impulse-radio ultra-wideband sensor on a mattress.

作者信息

Yu Byung Gyu, Oh Je Hyeok, Kim Yeomyung, Kim Tae Wook

机构信息

School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 30;12(8):e0183971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183971. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We developed a new chest compression depth (CCD) measuring technology using radar and impulse-radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) sensor. This study was performed to determine its accuracy on a soft surface.

METHODS

Four trials, trial 1: chest compressions on the floor using an accelerometer device; trial 2: chest compressions on the floor using an IR-UWB sensor; trial 3: chest compressions on a foam mattress using an accelerometer device; trial 4: chest compressions on a foam mattress using an IR-UWB sensor, were performed in a random order. In all the trials, a cardiopulmonary resuscitation provider delivered 50 uninterrupted chest compressions to a manikin.

RESULTS

The CCD measured by the manikin and the device were as follows: 57.42 ± 2.23 and 53.92 ± 2.92 mm, respectively in trial 1 (p < 0.001); 56.29 ± 1.96 and 54.16 ± 3.90 mm, respectively in trial 2 (p < 0.001); 55.61 ± 1.57 and 103.48 ± 10.48 mm, respectively in trial 3 (p < 0.001); 57.14 ± 3.99 and 55.51 ± 3.39 mm, respectively in trial 4 (p = 0.012). The gaps between the CCD measured by the manikin and the devices (accelerometer device vs. IR-UWB sensor) on the floor were not different (3.50 ± 2.08 mm vs. 3.15 ± 2.27 mm, respectively, p = 0.136). However, the gaps were significantly different on the foam mattress (48.53 ± 5.65 mm vs. 4.10 ± 2.47 mm, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The IR-UWB sensor could measure the CCD accurately both on the floor and on the foam mattress.

摘要

目的

我们开发了一种使用雷达和脉冲无线电超宽带(IR-UWB)传感器的新型胸外按压深度(CCD)测量技术。本研究旨在确定其在柔软表面上的准确性。

方法

进行了四项试验,试验1:使用加速度计设备在地板上进行胸外按压;试验2:使用IR-UWB传感器在地板上进行胸外按压;试验3:使用加速度计设备在泡沫床垫上进行胸外按压;试验4:使用IR-UWB传感器在泡沫床垫上进行胸外按压,按随机顺序进行。在所有试验中,一名心肺复苏提供者对一个人体模型进行50次不间断的胸外按压。

结果

人体模型和设备测量的CCD如下:试验1中分别为57.42±2.23和53.92±2.92毫米(p<0.001);试验2中分别为56.29±1.96和54.16±3.90毫米(p<0.001);试验3中分别为55.61±1.57和103.48±10.48毫米(p<0.001);试验4中分别为57.14±3.99和55.51±3.39毫米(p=0.012)。人体模型和设备(加速度计设备与IR-UWB传感器)在地板上测量的CCD之间的差距没有差异(分别为3.50±2.08毫米和3.15±2.27毫米,p=0.136)。然而,在泡沫床垫上差距有显著差异(48.53±5.65毫米与4.10±2.47毫米,p<0.001)。

结论

IR-UWB传感器在地板和泡沫床垫上均可准确测量CCD。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a12/5576690/f45654e0bf01/pone.0183971.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验