Erhart Philipp, Schiele Sandra, Ginsbach Philip, Grond-Ginsbach Caspar, Hakimi Maani, Böckler Dittmar, Lorenzo-Bermejo Justo, Dihlmann Susanne
1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Germany.
2 School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, UK.
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Dec;24(6):861-869. doi: 10.1177/1526602817729165. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
To investigate the association between local biomechanical rupture risk calculations from finite element analysis (FEA) and whole-genome profiling of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) wall to determine if AAA wall regions with highest and lowest estimated rupture risk show different gene expression patterns.
Six patients (mean age 74 years; all men) scheduled for open surgery to treat asymptomatic AAAs (mean diameter 55.2±3.5 mm) were recruited for the study. Rupture risk profiles were estimated by FEA from preoperative computed tomography angiography data. During surgery, AAA wall samples of ~10 mm were extracted from the lowest and highest rupture risk locations identified by the FEA. Twelve samples were processed for RNA extraction and subsequent whole genome expression profiling. Expression of single genes and of predefined gene groups were compared between vessel wall areas with highest and lowest predicted rupture risk.
Normalized datasets comprised 15,079 gene transcripts with expression above background. In biopsies with high rupture risk, upregulation of 18 and downregulation of 18 genes was detected when compared to the low-risk counterpart. Global analysis of predefined gene groups revealed expression differences in genes associated with extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation (p<0.001), matrix metalloproteinase activity (p<0.001), and chemokine signaling (p<0.001).
Increased expression of genes involved in degrading ECM components was present in AAA wall regions with highest biomechanical stress, supporting the thesis of mechanotransduction. More experimental studies with cooperation of multicenter vascular biobanks are necessary to understand AAA etiologies and identify further parameters of FEA model complementation.
研究通过有限元分析(FEA)计算的局部生物力学破裂风险与腹主动脉瘤(AAA)壁全基因组分析之间的关联,以确定估计破裂风险最高和最低的AAA壁区域是否表现出不同的基因表达模式。
招募了6例计划接受开放手术治疗无症状AAA(平均直径55.2±3.5mm)的患者(平均年龄74岁;均为男性)进行研究。术前通过FEA从计算机断层扫描血管造影数据估计破裂风险概况。手术期间,从FEA确定的最低和最高破裂风险位置提取约10mm的AAA壁样本。对12个样本进行RNA提取及后续全基因组表达分析。比较预测破裂风险最高和最低的血管壁区域之间单个基因和预定义基因组的表达。
标准化数据集包含15,079个表达高于背景的基因转录本。与低风险活检相比,高破裂风险活检中检测到18个基因上调和18个基因下调。对预定义基因组的整体分析显示,与细胞外基质(ECM)降解相关的基因(p<0.001)、基质金属蛋白酶活性相关的基因(p<0.001)和趋化因子信号相关的基因(p<0.001)存在表达差异。
在生物力学应力最高的AAA壁区域中,参与降解ECM成分的基因表达增加,支持机械转导理论。需要多中心血管生物样本库合作进行更多实验研究,以了解AAA病因并确定FEA模型补充的更多参数。