Erhart Philipp, Grond-Ginsbach Caspar, Hakimi Maani, Lasitschka Felix, Dihlmann Susanne, Böckler Dittmar, Hyhlik-Dürr Alexander
1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Germany.
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Aug;21(4):556-64. doi: 10.1583/14-4695.1.
To evaluate a finite element analysis (FEA) model as a predictive tool for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture risk assessment.
FEA of asymptomatic infrarenal AAAs in 15 men (mean age 72 years) was performed preoperatively using semiautomatic finite element analysis software (A4clinics) to calculate peak wall stress (PWS) and regions of highest and lowest rupture risk index (RRI). The areas of high and low RRI identified on the preoperative FEA were sampled during open surgery; aortic wall specimens were prepared for histological analysis. A semiquantitative score compared the histological findings from high and low rupture risk samples.
Significant correlation was found between histological AAA wall integrity and RRI in individual patients. AAA wall regions with highest RRI showed advanced histological disintegrity compared to regions with lower RRI within the same AAA: mean smooth muscle cells: 0.43 vs. 1.21, respectively (p=0.031); elastic fibers: 0.57 vs. 1.29, respectively (p=0.008); cholesterol plaque: 2.60 vs. 2.20, respectively (p=0.034); and calcified plaque: 2.27 vs. 1.40, respectively (p=0.017). The amount of calcified plaque was significantly correlated with PWS (r=0.528, p=0.043) by univariate regression analysis. However, there was no correlation between PWS or RRI and the histological findings between patients.
These preliminary results show that high rupture risk regions estimated by FEA contain increased histopathological degeneration compared to low rupture risk samples within the same AAA. Until now, the role of FEA in predicting individual AAA rupture risk has not been established as a validated diagnostic tool. However, these data provide promising results for FEA model verification.
评估有限元分析(FEA)模型作为腹主动脉瘤(AAA)破裂风险评估预测工具的效果。
术前使用半自动有限元分析软件(A4clinics)对15名男性(平均年龄72岁)无症状肾下腹主动脉瘤进行有限元分析,以计算峰值壁应力(PWS)以及破裂风险指数(RRI)最高和最低的区域。在开放手术期间对术前有限元分析中确定的高、低RRI区域进行取样;制备主动脉壁标本用于组织学分析。采用半定量评分比较高、低破裂风险样本的组织学结果。
发现个体患者的组织学腹主动脉瘤壁完整性与RRI之间存在显著相关性。与同一腹主动脉瘤内RRI较低的区域相比,RRI最高的腹主动脉瘤壁区域显示出更严重的组织学破坏:平均平滑肌细胞分别为0.43对1.21(p = 0.031);弹性纤维分别为0.57对1.29(p = 0.008);胆固醇斑块分别为2.60对2.20(p = 0.034);钙化斑块分别为2.27对1.40(p = 0.017)。通过单因素回归分析,钙化斑块的数量与PWS显著相关(r = 0.528,p = 0.043)。然而,患者之间的PWS或RRI与组织学结果之间没有相关性。
这些初步结果表明,与同一腹主动脉瘤内低破裂风险样本相比,有限元分析估计的高破裂风险区域组织病理学退变增加。到目前为止,有限元分析在预测个体腹主动脉瘤破裂风险方面的作用尚未作为一种经过验证的诊断工具确立。然而,这些数据为有限元分析模型验证提供了有希望的结果。