Stańczak Katarzyna, Zielińska Marzenna, Synder Marek, Domżalski Marcin, Polguj Michał, Sibiński Marcin
1 Clinic of Intensive Care, Cardiology, Clinic of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, 37808 Medical University of Lodz , ul. Pomorska, Łódź, Poland.
2 Clinic of Orthopedics and Pediatric Orthopedics, 37808 Medical University of Lodz , Łódź, Poland.
J Int Med Res. 2018 Feb;46(2):785-791. doi: 10.1177/0300060517722696. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
Objective This prospective randomized study was performed to compare the outcomes of two operative methods of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction based on either bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts or hamstring tendon (HT) grafts. Methods Among 100 patients, 96 completed the full follow-up period and were included in the final analysis (48 in the BTB group and 48 in the HT group). The patients were evaluated preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ACL reconstruction. The Kujala score, Tegner score, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were among the parameters used to evaluate the patients. Results Both groups were comparable in terms of sex, age, and body mass index. None of the analyzed scores were significantly different between the BTB and HT groups at either the initial or last visit. Both groups demonstrated improvement at the 12-year follow-up according to the Kujala score and most categories of the KOOS. The Tegner activity level score showed significant improvement in the HT but not BTB group. Conclusion Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with BTB and HT grafts show comparable improvement in functional results after 1 year of rehabilitation.
目的 本前瞻性随机研究旨在比较基于骨-髌腱-骨(BTB)移植物或腘绳肌腱(HT)移植物的两种前交叉韧带(ACL)重建手术方法的效果。方法 在100例患者中,96例完成了全部随访期并纳入最终分析(BTB组48例,HT组48例)。在ACL重建术前以及术后1、3、6和12个月对患者进行评估。用于评估患者的参数包括库贾拉评分、特格纳评分以及膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)。结果 两组在性别、年龄和体重指数方面具有可比性。在初次或末次随访时,BTB组和HT组之间分析的各项评分均无显著差异。根据库贾拉评分和KOOS的大多数类别,两组在12年随访时均显示出改善。特格纳活动水平评分显示HT组有显著改善,而BTB组无显著改善。结论 接受BTB和HT移植物进行ACL重建的患者在康复1年后功能结果改善相当。