Kao Li-Ting, Huang Chung-Chien, Lin Herng-Ching, Huang Chao-Yuan
Graduate Institute of Life Science, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 110, Taiwan, China.
Sleep Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan, China.
Asian J Androl. 2018 Jan-Feb;20(1):37-42. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_26_17.
Even though the relationship between antiarrhythmic drug usage and subsequent prostate cancer (PCa) risk has recently been highlighted, relevant findings in the previous literature are still inconsistent. In addition, very few studies have attempted to investigate the association between sodium channel blockers or potassium channel blockers for arrhythmia and the subsequent PCa risk. Therefore, this cohort study aimed to find the relationship between antiarrhythmic drug usage and the subsequent PCa risk using a population-based dataset. The data used in this study were derived from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005, Taiwan, China. We respectively identified 9988 sodium channel blocker users, 3663 potassium channel blocker users, 65 966 beta-blocker users, 23 366 calcium channel blockers users, and 7031 digoxin users as the study cohorts. The matched comparison cohorts (one comparison subject for each antiarrhythmic drug user) were selected from the same dataset. Each patient was tracked for a 5-year period to define those who were subsequently diagnosed with PCa. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and age, Cox proportional hazard regressions found that the hazard ratio (HR) of subsequent PCa for sodium channel blocker users was 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-1.50), for potassium channel blocker users was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.59-1.34), for beta-blocker users was 1.08 (95% CI: 0.96-1.22), for calcium channel blocker users was 1.14 (95% CI: 0.95-1.36), and for digoxin users was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.67-1.18), compared to their matched nonusers. We concluded that there were no statistical associations between different types of antiarrhythmic drug usage and subsequent PCa risk.
尽管抗心律失常药物使用与后续前列腺癌(PCa)风险之间的关系最近已受到关注,但先前文献中的相关研究结果仍不一致。此外,很少有研究试图探究用于治疗心律失常的钠通道阻滞剂或钾通道阻滞剂与后续PCa风险之间的关联。因此,这项队列研究旨在使用基于人群的数据集来找出抗心律失常药物使用与后续PCa风险之间的关系。本研究中使用的数据来自中国台湾地区的2005年纵向健康保险数据库。我们分别将9988名钠通道阻滞剂使用者、3663名钾通道阻滞剂使用者、65966名β受体阻滞剂使用者、23366名钙通道阻滞剂使用者和7031名地高辛使用者确定为研究队列。匹配的对照队列(每名抗心律失常药物使用者对应一名对照对象)从同一数据集中选取。对每位患者进行为期5年的跟踪,以确定那些随后被诊断为PCa的患者。在对社会人口学特征、合并症和年龄进行调整后,Cox比例风险回归发现,与匹配的未使用者相比,钠通道阻滞剂使用者后续发生PCa的风险比(HR)为1.12(95%置信区间[CI]:0.84 - 1.50),钾通道阻滞剂使用者为0.89(95%CI:0.59 - 1.34),β受体阻滞剂使用者为1.08(95%CI:0.96 - 1.22),钙通道阻滞剂使用者为1.14(95%CI:0.95 - 1.36),地高辛使用者为0.89(95%CI:0.67 - 1.18)。我们得出结论,不同类型抗心律失常药物的使用与后续PCa风险之间不存在统计学关联。