• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Self and informant report across the borderline personality disorder spectrum.自我报告和知情者报告横跨边缘型人格障碍谱。
Personal Disord. 2018 Sep;9(5):429-436. doi: 10.1037/per0000259. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
2
Gender Differences in Borderline Personality Disorder Features in an Epidemiological Sample of Adults Age 55-64: Self Versus Informant Report.55至64岁成年人流行病学样本中边缘型人格障碍特征的性别差异:自我报告与知情者报告
J Pers Disord. 2016 Jun;30(3):419-32. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_202. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
3
The Development of the Informant Five-Factor Borderline Inventory.知情者五因素边缘型人格量表的编制
Assessment. 2021 Jul;28(5):1334-1344. doi: 10.1177/1073191120959763. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
4
Assessment of borderline personality features in population samples: is the Personality Assessment Inventory-Borderline Features scale measurement invariant across sex and age?人群样本中边缘型人格特征的评估:《人格评估量表-边缘型特征量表》在性别和年龄上的测量是否具有不变性?
Psychol Assess. 2009 Mar;21(1):125-30. doi: 10.1037/a0014502.
5
Discrepancies in self- and informant-reports of personality pathology: Examining the DSM-5 Section III trait model.个体自身报告与知情者报告的人格病理学差异:检验 DSM-5 第三部分特质模型。
Personal Disord. 2019 Sep;10(5):456-467. doi: 10.1037/per0000342. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
6
Gender differences in borderline personality disorder: findings from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study.边缘型人格障碍中的性别差异:来自协作性纵向人格障碍研究的发现。
Compr Psychiatry. 2003 Jul-Aug;44(4):284-92. doi: 10.1016/S0010-440X(03)00090-7.
7
Development of a borderline personality disorder-relevant picture stimulus set.发展与边缘型人格障碍相关的图片刺激库。
J Pers Disord. 2010 Oct;24(5):664-75. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.5.664.
8
The Italian version of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: Validity data for adults and its association with severity of borderline personality disorder.《反思功能问卷》意大利语版:成人效标关联效度及其与边缘型人格障碍严重程度的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206433. eCollection 2018.
9
Comparing the Personality Disorder Interview for DSM-IV (PDI-IV) and SCID-II borderline personality disorder scales: an item-response theory analysis.比较《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍访谈量表(PDI-IV)与《精神障碍诊断统计手册》第二版边缘型人格障碍量表:一项项目反应理论分析
J Pers Assess. 2015;97(1):13-21. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2014.946606. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
10
Affect intensity and lability: the role of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in borderline personality disorder.情感强度和不稳定性:创伤后应激障碍症状在边缘型人格障碍中的作用。
Depress Anxiety. 2011 May;28(5):393-9. doi: 10.1002/da.20798. Epub 2011 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality Pathology and Substance Misuse in Later Life: Perspectives from Interviewer-, Self-, and Informant-Reports.晚年的人格病理学与物质滥用:来自访谈者、自我及知情者报告的视角
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2021 Sep;43(3):597-619. doi: 10.1007/s10862-020-09862-z. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
2
A Multi-Method Investigation of Normative and Pathological Personality Across the Spectrum of Gambling Involvement.多方法研究赌博参与度全谱的正常和病态人格。
J Gambl Stud. 2022 Mar;38(1):205-223. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10011-8. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
3
Borderline personality disorder and prior suicide attempts define a severity gradient among hospitalized adolescent suicide attempters.边缘型人格障碍和既往自杀未遂定义了住院青少年自杀未遂者的严重程度梯度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02930-4.
4
Unemployment and the Relationship between Borderline Personality Pathology and Health.失业与边缘型人格病理学和健康之间的关系。
J Res Pers. 2019 Oct;82. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103863. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
5
Personality Disorders in Older Adults: a Review of Epidemiology, Assessment, and Treatment.老年人人格障碍:流行病学、评估和治疗的综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Feb 6;22(3):14. doi: 10.1007/s11920-020-1133-x.
6
Role of personality disorder in randomised controlled trials of pharmacological interventions for adults with mood disorders: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.人格障碍在成人心境障碍药物干预随机对照试验中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 1;9(4):e025145. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025145.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Metaperception in Personality Disorders: Do People with Personality Problems Know How Others Experience Their Personality?元认知在人格障碍中的作用:有个性问题的人知道别人如何看待他们的个性吗?
J Pers Disord. 2015 Aug;29(4):449-67. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.449.
2
Gender Differences in Borderline Personality Disorder Features in an Epidemiological Sample of Adults Age 55-64: Self Versus Informant Report.55至64岁成年人流行病学样本中边缘型人格障碍特征的性别差异:自我报告与知情者报告
J Pers Disord. 2016 Jun;30(3):419-32. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_202. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
3
Are Informant Reports of Personality More Internally Consistent Than Self Reports of Personality?与人格自评报告相比,人格的他人报告是否具有更高的内部一致性?
Assessment. 2015 Aug;22(4):399-404. doi: 10.1177/1073191114556100. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
4
Prevalence of Personality Disorders at Midlife in a Community Sample: Disorders and Symptoms Reflected in Interview, Self, and Informant Reports.社区样本中中年人群人格障碍的患病率:访谈、自我报告和 informant 报告中反映的障碍与症状
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2014 Jun 1;36(2):177-188. doi: 10.1007/s10862-013-9389-7.
5
Specificity of affective instability in patients with borderline personality disorder compared to posttraumatic stress disorder, bulimia nervosa, and healthy controls.边缘型人格障碍患者与创伤后应激障碍、神经性贪食症患者及健康对照者相比,情感不稳定的特异性。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2014 Feb;123(1):258-72. doi: 10.1037/a0035619.
6
Aging: empirical contribution. A longitudinal analysis of personality disorder dimensions and personality traits in a community sample of older adults: perspectives from selves and informants.衰老:实证贡献。一项对老年人社区样本的人格障碍维度和人格特质的纵向分析:来自自我和知情者的观点。
J Pers Disord. 2014 Feb;28(1):151-65. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2014.28.1.151.
7
The enduring impact of maladaptive personality traits on relationship quality and health in later life.适应不良的人格特质对晚年人际关系质量和健康的持久影响。
J Pers. 2014 Dec;82(6):493-501. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12068. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
8
Ecological momentary assessment in borderline personality disorder: a review of recent findings and methodological challenges.边缘型人格障碍的生态瞬时评估:近期研究结果与方法学挑战述评。
J Pers Disord. 2014 Aug;28(4):555-76. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2012_26_067. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
Self-other knowledge asymmetries in personality pathology.人格病理学中的自我-他人知识不对称。
J Pers. 2013 Apr;81(2):155-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00794.x.
10
Self- and informant-reported perspectives on symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder.自我报告和知情者报告的自恋型人格障碍症状观点。
Personal Disord. 2012 Apr;3(2):140-54. doi: 10.1037/a0026576. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

自我报告和知情者报告横跨边缘型人格障碍谱。

Self and informant report across the borderline personality disorder spectrum.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2018 Sep;9(5):429-436. doi: 10.1037/per0000259. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1037/per0000259
PMID:28857585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6082732/
Abstract

Individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) features may be unaware of or unwilling to report their own personality or maladaptive behaviors, which complicates the assessment of BPD. Informants who know the individuals with BPD features may be uniquely suited to aid in the personality assessment of these individuals. The present study analyzed the comparative ability of individuals (targets) and informants to report BPD features across the continuum of BPD severity. The sample consisted of 1387 targets, ages 55 to 65 (56% women), who were recruited for an epidemiological longitudinal study examining the effects of PDs on health and social functioning. Each target nominated an informant who provided information about the target's personality. Results indicated relatively low levels of agreement between perspectives and that informants reported BPD symptoms with more precision and at lower levels of BPD severity than targets. The benefits of including an informant perspective when measuring the BPD continuum are discussed; these benefits may include gains in reliability and improvement in the prediction of outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

个体可能无法意识到或不愿意报告自己的人格或适应不良行为,这使得 BPD 的评估变得复杂。了解 BPD 特征的知情者可能特别适合帮助评估这些个体的人格。本研究分析了个体(目标)和知情者在 BPD 严重程度连续体上报告 BPD 特征的能力。样本包括 1387 名目标,年龄在 55 至 65 岁之间(56%为女性),他们被招募参加一项旨在研究 PD 对健康和社会功能影响的流行病学纵向研究。每个目标提名一名知情者,提供有关目标人格的信息。结果表明,不同视角之间的一致性相对较低,知情者报告的 BPD 症状比目标更准确,而且处于较低的 BPD 严重程度。讨论了在测量 BPD 连续体时纳入知情者视角的好处;这些好处可能包括提高可靠性和改善结果预测。