Santangelo Philip, Reinhard Iris, Mussgay Lutz, Steil Regina, Sawitzki Günther, Klein Christoph, Trull Timothy J, Bohus Martin, Ebner-Priemer Ulrich W
Department of Sport and Sport Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
Department of Biostatistics, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2014 Feb;123(1):258-72. doi: 10.1037/a0035619.
Affective instability is a core feature of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The use of advanced assessment methodologies and appropriate statistical analyses has led to consistent findings that indicate a heightened instability in patients with BPD compared with healthy controls. However, few studies have investigated the specificity of affective instability among patients with BPD with regard to relevant clinical control groups. In this study, 43 patients with BPD, 28 patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 20 patients with bulimia nervosa (BN), and 28 healthy controls carried e-diaries for 24 hours and were prompted to rate their momentary affective states approximately every 15 minutes while awake. To quantify instability, we used 3 state-of-the-art indices: multilevel models for squared successive differences (SSDs), multilevel models for probability of acute changes (PACs), and aggregated point-by-point changes (APPCs). Patients with BPD displayed heightened affective instability for emotional valence and distress compared with healthy controls, regardless of the specific instability indices. These results directly replicate earlier studies. However, affective instability did not seem to be specific to patients with BPD. With regard to SSDs, PACs, and APPCs, patients with PTSD or BN showed a similar heightened instability of affect (emotional valence and distress) to that of patients with BPD. Our results give raise to the discussion if affective instability is a transdiagnostic or a disorder-specific mechanism. Current evidence cannot answer this question, but investigating psychopathological mechanisms in everyday life across disorders is a promising approach to enhance validity and specificity of mental health diagnoses.
情感不稳定是边缘性人格障碍(BPD)的一个核心特征。先进评估方法和适当统计分析的运用已得出一致的研究结果,表明与健康对照组相比,BPD患者的情感不稳定程度更高。然而,很少有研究针对相关临床对照组来探究BPD患者情感不稳定的特异性。在本研究中,43名BPD患者、28名创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者、20名神经性贪食症(BN)患者以及28名健康对照者携带电子日记24小时,并在清醒时大约每15分钟被提示对其即时情感状态进行评分。为了量化不稳定性,我们使用了3个最先进的指标:连续平方差(SSD)的多层次模型、急性变化概率(PAC)的多层次模型以及逐点汇总变化(APPC)。与健康对照者相比,无论具体的不稳定性指标如何,BPD患者在情绪效价和痛苦方面都表现出更高的情感不稳定。这些结果直接重复了早期的研究。然而,情感不稳定似乎并非BPD患者所特有。就SSD、PAC和APPC而言,PTSD或BN患者表现出与BPD患者类似的情感(情绪效价和痛苦)高度不稳定。我们的研究结果引发了关于情感不稳定是一种跨诊断机制还是一种特定障碍机制的讨论。目前的证据无法回答这个问题,但在日常生活中跨障碍研究心理病理机制是提高心理健康诊断有效性和特异性的一种有前景的方法。