Ma Celena, Pejo Ervin, McGrath Megan, Jayakar Selwyn S, Zhou Xiaojuan, Miller Keith W, Cohen Jonathan B, Raines Douglas E
From the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (C.M., E.P., M.M., X.Z., K.W.M., D.E.R.); and Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (S.S.J., J.B.C.).
Anesthesiology. 2017 Nov;127(5):824-837. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001840.
The authors characterized the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor pharmacology of the novel etomidate analog naphthalene-etomidate, a potential lead compound for the development of anesthetic-selective competitive antagonists.
The positive modulatory potencies and efficacies of etomidate and naphthalene-etomidate were defined in oocyte-expressed α1β3γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors using voltage clamp electrophysiology. Using the same technique, the ability of naphthalene-etomidate to reduce currents evoked by γ-aminobutyric acid alone or γ-aminobutyric acid potentiated by etomidate, propofol, pentobarbital, and diazepam was quantified. The binding affinity of naphthalene-etomidate to the transmembrane anesthetic binding sites of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor was determined from its ability to inhibit receptor photoaffinity labeling by the site-selective photolabels [H]azi-etomidate and R-[H]5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid.
In contrast to etomidate, naphthalene-etomidate only weakly potentiated γ-aminobutyric acid-evoked currents and induced little direct activation even at a near-saturating aqueous concentration. It inhibited labeling of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors by [H]azi-etomidate and R-[H]5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid with similar half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of 48 μM (95% CI, 28 to 81 μM) and 33 μM (95% CI, 20 to 54 μM). It also reduced the positive modulatory actions of anesthetics (propofol > etomidate ~ pentobarbital) but not those of γ-aminobutyric acid or diazepam. At 300 μM, naphthalene-etomidate increased the half-maximal potentiating propofol concentration from 6.0 μM (95% CI, 4.4 to 8.0 μM) to 36 μM (95% CI, 17 to 78 μM) without affecting the maximal response obtained at high propofol concentrations.
Naphthalene-etomidate is a very low-efficacy etomidate analog that exhibits the pharmacology of an anesthetic competitive antagonist at the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor.
作者对新型依托咪酯类似物萘基依托咪酯的γ-氨基丁酸A型受体药理学特性进行了表征,萘基依托咪酯是开发麻醉选择性竞争性拮抗剂的潜在先导化合物。
使用电压钳电生理学方法,在卵母细胞表达的α1β3γ2Lγ-氨基丁酸A型受体中确定依托咪酯和萘基依托咪酯的正向调节效力和效能。使用相同技术,定量萘基依托咪酯降低单独由γ-氨基丁酸或由依托咪酯、丙泊酚、戊巴比妥和地西泮增强的γ-氨基丁酸诱发电流的能力。通过萘基依托咪酯抑制位点选择性光标记物[H]氮杂依托咪酯和R-[H]5-烯丙基-1-甲基-5-(间三氟甲基-二氮杂环丙烯基苯基)巴比妥酸对受体光亲和标记的能力,来确定萘基依托咪酯与γ-氨基丁酸A型受体跨膜麻醉结合位点的结合亲和力。
与依托咪酯不同,萘基依托咪酯仅微弱增强γ-氨基丁酸诱发的电流,即使在接近饱和的水溶液浓度下也几乎不引起直接激活。它抑制[H]氮杂依托咪酯和R-[H]5-烯丙基-1-甲基-5-(间三氟甲基-二氮杂环丙烯基苯基)巴比妥酸对γ-氨基丁酸A型受体的标记,半数最大抑制浓度分别为48μM(95%可信区间,28至81μM)和33μM(95%可信区间,20至54μM),二者相似。它还降低了麻醉剂(丙泊酚>依托咪酯~戊巴比妥)的正向调节作用,但不影响γ-氨基丁酸或地西泮的正向调节作用。在300μM时,萘基依托咪酯将丙泊酚的半数最大增强浓度从6.0μM(95%可信区间,4.4至8.0μM)提高到36μM(95%可信区间,17至78μM),而不影响在高丙泊酚浓度下获得的最大反应。
萘基依托咪酯是一种效能极低的依托咪酯类似物,在γ-氨基丁酸A型受体上表现出麻醉竞争性拮抗剂的药理学特性。