Towbin K E, Leckman J F, Cohen D J
Psychiatr Dev. 1987 Spring;5(1):25-50.
Nearly every category of psychotropic drug has been investigated in an attempt to find a pharmacologic treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). This study reviews published trials from the English literature in which tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, neuroleptics, benzodiazepines, and other agents were employed for treatment of OCD. Weaknesses in the current methodology including diagnosis, measurement of severity and criteria for improvement have contributed to invalid conclusions about drug treatment and efficacy. It appears that OCD is an etiologically heterogeneous disorder with a complex differential diagnosis. For the clinician, a major conclusion drawn from this review is that no agent emerges as a drug of choice. Although clorimipramine, the most actively investigated agent, shows some promise, it has not been conclusively demonstrated that other, more readily available heterocyclic agents are less effective. Furthermore, when other disorders co-exist, such as panic disorder, alternative agents may prove as effective.
几乎每一类精神药物都曾被研究,试图找到一种治疗强迫症(OCD)的药物疗法。本研究回顾了英文文献中已发表的试验,其中使用三环类抗抑郁药、单胺氧化酶抑制剂、抗精神病药、苯二氮䓬类药物及其他药物来治疗强迫症。当前方法存在的弱点,包括诊断、严重程度的测量以及改善标准,导致了关于药物治疗和疗效的无效结论。强迫症似乎是一种病因异质性疾病,鉴别诊断复杂。对于临床医生而言,本综述得出的一个主要结论是,没有一种药物成为首选药物。尽管氯米帕明是研究最活跃的药物,显示出一些前景,但尚未确凿证明其他更容易获得的杂环类药物效果较差。此外,当存在其他共病时,如惊恐障碍,其他药物可能同样有效。