Kim Se Woo, Kim Se Hyung, Lee Dong Ho, Lee Sang Min, Kim Yeon Soo, Jang Jin Young, Han Joon Koo
1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
2 Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov;209(5):1046-1055. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17963. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the differential CT features of isolated benign and malignant main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation and to investigate whether the diagnostic performance of radiologists can be improved with knowledge of these differential CT features.
Forty-one patients who had isolated MPD dilatation without any visible mass on CT from January 2000 to October 2016 were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Two radiologists reviewed CT images in consensus for the location, shape (smooth vs abrupt), length of transition, dilated pancreatic duct (PD) diameter, presence of duct penetrating sign, parenchymal atrophy, attenuation difference, associated pancreatitis, calcification, PD or common bile duct (CBD) enhancement, and perilesional cyst. The chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and t test were used to find the differential CT features of benign and malignant MPD dilatation. Two successive review sessions for differentiation between the two disease entities were then independently performed by three other reviewers with differing expertise, with the use of a 5-point confidence scale. The first session provided no information for differentiation; however, reviewers were aware of the results of univariate analyses in the second session. The diagnostic performance of the radiologists was evaluated using a pairwise comparison of ROC curves.
A total of 19 benign and 22 malignant MPD dilatations were identified. In patients with benign MPD dilatation, transition areas were frequently located in the head (57.9% [11/19] vs 13.6% [3/22], p = 0.003) and showed significantly shorter (< 6.1 mm) (78.9% [15/19] vs 9.1% [2/22], p < 0.0001) and smooth transition (89.5% [17/19] vs 9.1% [2/22], p < 0.0001). Duct penetrating sign was exclusively observed in patients with benign MPD dilatation (73.7% [14/19] vs 0% [0/22], p < 0.0001). In contrast, malignant MPD dilatation frequently was accompanied by attenuation difference (63.6% [14/22] vs 10.5% [2/19], p = 0.001) and associated PD or CBD enhancement (36.4% [8/22] vs 0% [0/19], p = 0.003). The AUC values of three reviewers significantly increased from 0.653, 0.587, and 0.884 to 0.864, 0.964, and 0.908, respectively, with knowledge of significant CT features (p = 0.013, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.701, respectively).
Distal, long (≥ 6.1 mm), and abrupt transition, the absence of duct penetrating sign, and the presence of attenuation difference and PD or CBD enhancement were highly suggestive CT findings for differentiation of malignant from benign MPD dilatation. The diagnostic performance of radiologists with regard to differentiation was significantly improved with knowledge of these highly suggestive CT criteria.
本研究旨在回顾性评估孤立性良性和恶性主胰管(MPD)扩张的CT特征差异,并探讨了解这些CT特征差异是否能提高放射科医生的诊断效能。
回顾性纳入2000年1月至2016年10月期间CT检查发现孤立性MPD扩张且无可见肿块的41例患者。两名放射科医生共同回顾CT图像,观察病变位置、形态(光滑与突然改变)、移行段长度、扩张胰管(PD)直径、胰管穿入征、实质萎缩、密度差异、合并胰腺炎、钙化、PD或胆总管(CBD)强化以及病灶周围囊肿情况。采用卡方检验、Fisher确切概率法和t检验来寻找良性和恶性MPD扩张的CT特征差异。然后由另外三名专业水平不同的审阅者独立进行两轮区分这两种疾病实体的审阅,采用5分制置信度评分。第一轮审阅不提供鉴别信息;然而,审阅者在第二轮审阅中知晓单因素分析结果。通过ROC曲线成对比较评估放射科医生的诊断效能。
共识别出19例良性和22例恶性MPD扩张。良性MPD扩张患者中,移行段常位于胰头(57.9%[11/19]对13.6%[3/22],p = 0.003)且移行段明显较短(< 6.1 mm)(78.9%[15/19]对9.1%[2/22],p < 0.0001),呈光滑移行(89.5%[17/19]对9.1%[2/22],p < 0.0001)。胰管穿入征仅在良性MPD扩张患者中观察到(73.7%[14/19]对0%[0/22],p < 0.0001)。相反,恶性MPD扩张常伴有密度差异(63.6%[14/22]对10.5%[2/19],p = 0.001)以及合并PD或CBD强化(36.4%[8/22]对0%[0/19],p = 0.003)。了解显著CT特征后,三名审阅者的AUC值分别从0.653、0.587和0.884显著提高到0.864、0.964和0.908(p分别为0.013、< 0.0001和0.701)。
远端、长(≥ 6.1 mm)且突然改变的移行段、无胰管穿入征以及存在密度差异和PD或CBD强化是鉴别恶性与良性MPD扩张的高度提示性CT表现。了解这些高度提示性CT标准后,放射科医生在鉴别诊断方面的诊断效能显著提高。