• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估严重精神疾病患者戒烟实践指南。

An appraisal of practice guidelines for smoking cessation in people with severe mental illness.

机构信息

1 School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.

2 Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;51(11):1106-1120. doi: 10.1177/0004867417726176. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1177/0004867417726176
PMID:28859486
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the quality of current smoking cessation guidelines that include recommendations for people with severe mental illness.

METHODS

A systematic search of scientific databases, central government health authority websites, psychiatry peak bodies, guideline clearing houses and Google was undertaken for relevant smoking cessation guidelines. Three reviewers independently assessed guideline quality using the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation II) instrument. Two reviewers extracted recommendations specific to smokers with severe mental illness.

RESULTS

Thirteen guidelines met the inclusion criteria. Seven guidelines scored ⩾60% in at least four domains. Median scores for 'Editorial independence', 'Rigour of development', 'Stakeholder Involvement' and 'Applicability' were less than 60%. The highest median scores were for 'Scope and purpose' (87%, 69-96%) and 'Clarity of presentation' (87%, 56-98%). 'Editorial independence' (33.3%, 0-86%) and 'Rigour of development' (54%, 11-92%) had the lowest median domain scores. The guidelines varied greatly in their recommendations but the majority recommended nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion or varenicline as first-line pharmacotherapy, along with behavioural support.

CONCLUSION

Many guidelines did not adequately report their methods or the competing interests of the authors. Future guidelines development may benefit from more specifically addressing AGREE II criteria and the needs of smokers with severe mental illness.

摘要

目的

综述纳入严重精神疾病患者推荐意见的戒烟指南的质量。

方法

系统检索科学数据库、中央政府卫生部门网站、精神病学权威机构、指南制定机构和谷歌,以获取相关戒烟指南。三位评审员使用 AGREE II(评估研究和评估指南 II)工具独立评估指南质量。两位评审员提取了针对严重精神疾病吸烟者的具体建议。

结果

符合纳入标准的指南有 13 条。有 7 条指南在至少 4 个领域的得分 ⩾60%。“编辑独立性”、“制定严谨性”、“利益相关者参与”和“适用性”的中位数评分均低于 60%。“范围和目的”(87%,69-96%)和“表述清晰度”(87%,56-98%)的中位数评分最高。“编辑独立性”(33.3%,0-86%)和“制定严谨性”(54%,11-92%)的中位数评分最低。这些指南在推荐意见上差异很大,但大多数建议将尼古丁替代疗法、安非他酮或伐尼克兰作为一线药物治疗,并辅以行为支持。

结论

许多指南没有充分报告其方法或作者的利益冲突。未来的指南制定可能会从更具体地解决 AGREE II 标准和严重精神疾病吸烟者的需求中受益。

相似文献

1
An appraisal of practice guidelines for smoking cessation in people with severe mental illness.评估严重精神疾病患者戒烟实践指南。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;51(11):1106-1120. doi: 10.1177/0004867417726176. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
2
Appraisal of International Guidelines on Smoking Cessation using the AGREE II Assessment Tool.使用AGREE II评估工具对国际戒烟指南进行评估。
Ir Med J. 2019 Feb 14;112(2):867.
3
Appraisal of guidelines for androgenetic alopecia using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.使用《研究与评价指南II》工具对雄激素性脱发指南进行评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;21(6):1089-94. doi: 10.1111/jep.12474. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
4
Occupational Asthma guidelines: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.职业性哮喘指南:使用 AGREE II 工具进行系统质量评估。
Occup Environ Med. 2014 Feb;71(2):81-6. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101656. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
5
Guidelines for the treatment of pneumonia and urinary tract infections: evaluation of methodological quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation II instrument.肺炎和尿路感染治疗指南:使用 AGREE II 工具评估方法学质量。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Dec;19(12):1106-14. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12348. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
6
The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies.过去二十年临床实践指南的质量:指南评估研究的系统综述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e58. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2010.042077.
7
Guidelines of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies: an overview and quality appraisal using AGREE II.红十字与红新月国际联合会指南:使用AGREE II进行概述与质量评估
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 27;6(9):e011744. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011744.
8
Quality of clinical practice guidelines in delirium: a systematic appraisal.谵妄临床实践指南的质量:一项系统评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 10;7(3):e013809. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013809.
9
Quality of stroke rehabilitation clinical practice guidelines.中风康复临床实践指南的质量
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;13(4):657-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00708.x.
10
[Critically appraised article: The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guidelines appraisal studies].[严格评价的文章:过去二十年临床实践指南的质量:指南评价研究的系统综述]
Rev Med Chil. 2014 Jan;142(1):105-8. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014000100016.

引用本文的文献

1
Are clinical guidelines designed according to guidelines? Cross-sectional assessment of quality and transparency of clinical guidelines in urology.临床指南是否根据指南设计?泌尿科临床指南质量和透明度的横断面评估。
World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1489-1494. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2278-7. Epub 2018 Apr 2.