Svedäng Henrik, Hornborg Sara
Department of Aquatic Resources Institute of Marine Research Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Lysekil Sweden.
Present address: Swedish Institute for the Marine Environment (SIME) Gothenburg Swedenand.
Ecol Evol. 2017 Jun 28;7(16):6089-6102. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3173. eCollection 2017 Aug.
Understanding how combinations of fishing effort and selectivity affect productivity is central to fisheries research. We investigate the roles of fishing regulation in comparison with ecosystem status for Baltic Sea cod stock productivity, growth performance, and population stability. This case study is interesting because three cod populations with different exploitation patterns and stock status are located in three adjacent but partially, ecologically different areas. In assessing stock status, growth, and productivity, we use survey information and rather basic stock parameters without relying on age readings. Because there is an urgent interest of better understanding of the current development of the Eastern Baltic cod stock, we argue that our approach represents partly a novel way of interpreting monitoring information together with catch data in a simplified yet more informative way. Our study reports how the Eastern and Western Baltic cod have gone toward more truncated size structures between 1991 and 2016, in particular for the Eastern Baltic cod, whereas the Öresund cod show no trend. We suggest that selective fishing may disrupt fish population dynamic stability and that lower natural productivity might amplify the effects of selective fishing. In support of earlier findings on a density-dependent growth of Eastern Baltic cod, management is advised to acknowledge that sustainable exploitation levels for Eastern Baltic cod are much more limited than perceived in regular assessments. Of more general importance, our results emphasize the need to embrace a more realistic view on what ecosystems can produce regarding tractable fish biomass to facilitate a more ecosystem-based fisheries management.
了解捕捞努力量和选择性的组合如何影响生产力是渔业研究的核心。我们将捕捞监管与波罗的海鳕鱼种群生产力、生长性能和种群稳定性的生态系统状况进行比较,以研究捕捞监管的作用。本案例研究很有趣,因为三个具有不同开发模式和种群状况的鳕鱼种群位于三个相邻但部分生态不同的区域。在评估种群状况、生长和生产力时,我们使用调查信息和相当基本的种群参数,而不依赖年龄读数。由于迫切需要更好地了解波罗的海东部鳕鱼种群的当前发展情况,我们认为我们的方法部分代表了一种以简化但更具信息性的方式解释监测信息和渔获数据的新方法。我们的研究报告了1991年至2016年间波罗的海东部和西部鳕鱼如何朝着更截断的体型结构发展,特别是波罗的海东部鳕鱼,而厄勒海峡鳕鱼则没有趋势。我们认为选择性捕捞可能会破坏鱼类种群动态稳定性,较低的自然生产力可能会放大选择性捕捞的影响。为支持早期关于波罗的海东部鳕鱼密度依赖性生长的研究结果,建议管理部门认识到,波罗的海东部鳕鱼的可持续开发水平比常规评估中所认为的要有限得多。更普遍重要的是,我们的结果强调需要对生态系统在可管理鱼类生物量方面能够产生的东西持更现实的看法,以促进更基于生态系统的渔业管理。