• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Treatment of elevated intraocular pressure with concurrent levobunolol and pilocarpine.

作者信息

David R, Ober M, Masi R, Elman J, Novack G D, Sears M L, Batoosingh A L

出版信息

Can J Ophthalmol. 1987 Jun;22(4):208-11.

PMID:2886200
Abstract

Between July 1983 and January 1986, 54 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were treated for 3 months with 2% pilocarpine hydrochloride (given four times daily) and one of two beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs, levobunolol hydrochloride (0.5% [17 patients] or 1% [19 patients]) or 0.5% timolol maleate (18 patients), given twice daily. Before entry into the study all patients had had stable intraocular pressure (IOP) with treatment with 0.5% timolol and 2% pilocarpine. Stable IOP was successfully maintained in up to 88% of the patients in the two levobunolol-pilocarpine groups and in 83% of those in the timolol-pilocarpine group. Two patients experienced adverse reactions: one, who received timolol and pilocarpine, suffered blepharoconjunctivitis, and the other, who received 1% levobunolol and pilocarpine, experienced bradycardia. The results indicate that the levobunolol-pilocarpine regimens were as safe and effective as the timolol-pilocarpine regimen in stabilizing IOP.

摘要

相似文献

1
Treatment of elevated intraocular pressure with concurrent levobunolol and pilocarpine.
Can J Ophthalmol. 1987 Jun;22(4):208-11.
2
[Comparative study of levobunolol and timolol in the treatment of chronic open-angle glaucoma and chronic ocular hypertension].左旋布诺洛尔与噻吗洛尔治疗慢性开角型青光眼和慢性高眼压症的对比研究
J Fr Ophtalmol. 1988;11(8-9):587-90.
3
Efficacy and safety of once-daily levobunolol for glaucoma therapy.
Can J Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;24(1):2-6.
4
A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of 0.5% timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution QD and 0.5% levobunolol hydrochloride BID in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Apr;18(2):105-13. doi: 10.1089/108076802317373860.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of 0.5% timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution QD compared with 0.5% levobunolol hydrochloride BID in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Clin Ther. 1998 Nov-Dec;20(6):1170-8. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80112-4.
6
Levobunolol compared with timolol for the control of elevated intraocular pressure.左旋布诺洛尔与噻吗洛尔治疗眼压升高的对照研究。
Ann Ophthalmol. 1986 Oct;18(10):289-90, 292.
7
Levobunolol. A beta-adrenoceptor antagonist effective in the long-term treatment of glaucoma. The Levobunolol Study Group (Appended).
Ophthalmology. 1985 Sep;92(9):1271-6.
8
Long-term evaluation of 0.25% levobunolol and timolol for therapy for elevated intraocular pressure.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1988 May;106(5):614-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130668023.
9
Levobunolol compared with timolol for the long-term control of elevated intraocular pressure.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Mar;103(3):379-82. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050030075025.
10
[Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of levobunolol and timolol in ocular hypertension and chronic open-angle glaucoma].[左旋布诺洛尔与噻吗洛尔治疗高眼压症和慢性开角型青光眼的有效性和安全性比较]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1988 Sep;193(3):257-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1050254.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraocular pressure rise after phacoemulsification with posterior chamber lens implantation: effect of prophylactic medication, wound closure, and surgeon's experience.白内障超声乳化吸除联合后房型人工晶状体植入术后眼压升高:预防性用药、伤口闭合及术者经验的影响
Br J Ophthalmol. 1995 Sep;79(9):809-13. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.9.809.
2
Ocular levobunolol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy.
Drugs. 1987 Dec;34(6):648-61. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198734060-00002.