• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左旋布诺洛尔与噻吗洛尔治疗慢性开角型青光眼和慢性高眼压症的对比研究

[Comparative study of levobunolol and timolol in the treatment of chronic open-angle glaucoma and chronic ocular hypertension].

作者信息

Savelsbergh-Fillette M P, Demailly P

出版信息

J Fr Ophtalmol. 1988;11(8-9):587-90.

PMID:2906644
Abstract

Forty patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension participated in this randomized double-masked clinical trial. The patients instilled either 0.5% Levobunolol or 0.5% Timolol into each eye twice daily for three months. Levobunolol produced an overall decrease in mean intraocular pressure of approximately 7 mmHg, while Timolol produced an overall decrease of approximately 5 mmHg but no significant difference has been proved. Intraocular pressure was inadequately controlled in five patients in each treatment group. Both drugs caused heart rate decreases that were judged to be of limited clinical significance. Levobunolol was found to be as safe and effective as Timolol for the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma as for those with chronic ocular hypertension.

摘要

40例慢性开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者参与了这项随机双盲临床试验。患者每天两次向每只眼睛滴入0.5%的左布诺洛尔或0.5%的噻吗洛尔,持续三个月。左布诺洛尔使平均眼压总体下降约7 mmHg,而噻吗洛尔使平均眼压总体下降约5 mmHg,但尚未证实存在显著差异。每个治疗组均有5例患者的眼压控制不佳。两种药物均导致心率下降,但其临床意义有限。结果发现,对于开角型青光眼患者和慢性高眼压症患者,左布诺洛尔在治疗上与噻吗洛尔一样安全有效。

相似文献

1
[Comparative study of levobunolol and timolol in the treatment of chronic open-angle glaucoma and chronic ocular hypertension].左旋布诺洛尔与噻吗洛尔治疗慢性开角型青光眼和慢性高眼压症的对比研究
J Fr Ophtalmol. 1988;11(8-9):587-90.
2
[Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of levobunolol and timolol in ocular hypertension and chronic open-angle glaucoma].[左旋布诺洛尔与噻吗洛尔治疗高眼压症和慢性开角型青光眼的有效性和安全性比较]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1988 Sep;193(3):257-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1050254.
3
[Pressure lowering effect and side effects of 0.5% and 1.0% levobunolol eyedrops, compared with 0.5% timolol eyedrops in patients with open-angle glaucoma].[0.5%和1.0%左布诺洛尔滴眼液与0.5%噻吗洛尔滴眼液相比对开角型青光眼患者的降压效果及副作用]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1985 Dec;187(6):537-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1054395.
4
Levobunolol compared with timolol for the control of elevated intraocular pressure.左旋布诺洛尔与噻吗洛尔治疗眼压升高的对照研究。
Ann Ophthalmol. 1986 Oct;18(10):289-90, 292.
5
Efficacy and safety of once-daily levobunolol for glaucoma therapy.
Can J Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;24(1):2-6.
6
The safety and efficacy of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination versus dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.1%布林佐胺/0.5%噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂与2%多佐胺/0.5%噻吗洛尔治疗开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者的安全性和有效性比较
J Glaucoma. 2009 Apr-May;18(4):293-300. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31818fb434.
7
Efficacy of twice-daily levobunolol in the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure.每日两次使用左布诺洛尔治疗眼压升高的疗效。
Can J Ophthalmol. 1988 Jun;23(4):168-70.
8
Treatment of elevated intraocular pressure with concurrent levobunolol and pilocarpine.
Can J Ophthalmol. 1987 Jun;22(4):208-11.
9
A 6-week, double-masked, parallel-group study of the efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with latanoprost 0:005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.一项为期6周的双盲平行组研究,比较0.004%曲伏前列素与0.005%拉坦前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔治疗原发性开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者的疗效和安全性。
Clin Ther. 2006 Mar;28(3):332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.03.001.
10
Levobunolol. A four-year study of efficacy and safety in glaucoma treatment. The Levobunolol Study Group.
Ophthalmology. 1989 May;96(5):642-5.