Department of Medicine,Division of Neurosurgery,University of Saskatchewan,Canada.
Department of and Surgery,Division of Neurosurgery,University of Saskatchewan,Canada.
Can J Neurol Sci. 2017 Sep;44(5):532-537. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2017.46.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy has been widely recognized as an alternative for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy, although modification of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during VNS treatment could explain the improvement in patients.
We retrospectively assessed the efficacy of VNS in 30 adult patients with epilepsy treated with >6 months of follow-up. The criteria for implantation were the following: (1) not a candidate for resective epilepsy surgery, (2) drug-resistant epilepsy, (3) impairment of quality of life, (4) no other option of treatment, and (5) patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy who fail to be controlled with appropriate AEDs. We assessed sociodemographics, seizure etiology, seizure classification, and AEDs used during treatment with VNS. We assessed adverse effects and efficacy. Responder rate was defined as >50% seizure improvement from baseline.
Thirty patients (females, 18; males, 12; age, 35.1±13.3 years) were included. After 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up, the response rates were: 13/30 (43%), 13/27 (48%), 9/22 (41%), and 8/16 (50%), respectively; none was seizure free. Fifty-seven percent, 33%, 59%, and 81% of patients had changes of medication type or dose at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months respectively. In the majority of patients, the change of medication consisted of an increase in the dose of AEDs.
Our study shows that VNS is an effective therapy, although significant changes in medications were done along with the therapy; therefore, the real effect of VNS could be controversial.
迷走神经刺激(VNS)疗法已被广泛认为是治疗耐药性癫痫的一种替代方法,尽管在 VNS 治疗期间改变抗癫痫药物(AEDs)可能可以解释患者的改善。
我们回顾性评估了 30 例接受 >6 个月随访的成年癫痫患者的 VNS 疗效。植入标准如下:(1)不适合进行癫痫切除术,(2)耐药性癫痫,(3)生活质量受损,(4)无其他治疗选择,(5)特发性全面性癫痫患者,不能用适当的 AED 控制。我们评估了社会人口统计学、癫痫病因、癫痫分类以及在 VNS 治疗期间使用的 AEDs。我们评估了不良反应和疗效。反应率定义为基线时癫痫发作改善>50%。
30 例患者(女性 18 例,男性 12 例;年龄 35.1±13.3 岁)纳入本研究。在 6、12、24 和 36 个月的随访后,反应率分别为:30/30(43%)、27/30(48%)、22/22(41%)和 16/16(50%);无患者无癫痫发作。分别有 57%、33%、59%和 81%的患者在 6、12、24 和 36 个月时药物类型或剂量发生变化。在大多数患者中,药物剂量的增加构成了药物变化的主要内容。
我们的研究表明,VNS 是一种有效的治疗方法,尽管随着治疗的进行,药物发生了显著变化;因此,VNS 的实际效果可能存在争议。