Suppr超能文献

会阴部滑石粉使用与卵巢癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Perineal Talc Use and Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

From the Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Discipline of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2018 Jan;29(1):41-49. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000745.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been posited that there is an association between perineal talc use and the incidence of ovarian cancer. To date, this has only been explored in observational studies.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between perineal talc use and risk of ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Studies were identified using six electronic databases. Observational studies involving at least 50 cases of ovarian cancer were eligible for inclusion. We analyzed the association between ovarian cancer, including specific types, and any perineal talc use, long-term (>10 years) use, total lifetime applications, and use on diaphragms or sanitary napkins. A subgroup analysis was performed, stratifying by study design and population.

RESULTS

We identified 24 case-control (13,421 cases) and three cohort studies (890 cases, 181,860 person-years). Any perineal talc use was associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.24, 1.39). More than 3600 lifetime applications (OR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.25, 1.61) were slightly more associated with ovarian cancer than <3600 (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.15, 1.50). An association with ever use of talc was found in case-control studies (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.27, 1.43), but not cohort studies (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.90, 1.25). However, cohort studies found an association between talc use and invasive serous type ovarian cancer (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.55). We found an increased risk of serous and endometrioid, but not mucinous or clear cell subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, there is a consistent association between perineal talc use and ovarian cancer. Some variation in the magnitude of the effect was found when considering study design and ovarian cancer subtype.

摘要

背景

有人提出,外阴滑石粉的使用与卵巢癌的发病率之间存在关联。迄今为止,这仅在观察性研究中进行了探讨。

目的

进行荟萃分析以评估外阴滑石粉使用与卵巢癌风险之间的关联。

方法

使用六个电子数据库来识别研究。纳入至少有 50 例卵巢癌病例的观察性研究符合条件。我们分析了卵巢癌(包括特定类型)与任何外阴滑石粉使用、长期(>10 年)使用、总使用次数以及在护垫或卫生巾上使用之间的关联。进行了亚组分析,按研究设计和人群进行分层。

结果

我们确定了 24 项病例对照研究(13421 例)和 3 项队列研究(890 例,181860 人年)。任何外阴滑石粉的使用与卵巢癌风险增加相关(OR=1.31;95%CI=1.24,1.39)。与<3600 次的使用相比,超过 3600 次的终生使用(OR=1.42;95%CI=1.25,1.61)与卵巢癌的相关性略高。在病例对照研究中发现了与滑石粉的既往使用有关的关联(OR=1.35;95%CI=1.27,1.43),但在队列研究中没有发现(OR=1.06;95%CI=0.90,1.25)。然而,队列研究发现滑石粉的使用与侵袭性浆液性卵巢癌之间存在关联(OR=1.25;95%CI=1.01,1.55)。我们发现浆液性和子宫内膜样性卵巢癌亚型的风险增加,但黏液性或透明细胞性卵巢癌亚型没有发现这种风险增加。

结论

一般来说,外阴滑石粉的使用与卵巢癌之间存在一致的关联。当考虑研究设计和卵巢癌亚型时,发现效应幅度存在一些变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验