• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

商业减肥项目的在线减重宣称与随机对照试验结果的比较

Commercial Programs' Online Weight-Loss Claims Compared to Results from Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Vakil Rachit M, Chaudhry Zoobia W, Doshi Ruchi S, Clark Jeanne M, Gudzune Kimberly A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Nov;25(11):1885-1893. doi: 10.1002/oby.21959. Epub 2017 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1002/oby.21959
PMID:28865085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5678966/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize weight-loss claims and disclaimers present on websites for commercial weight-loss programs and compare them with results from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A content analysis of all home pages and testimonials available on the websites of 24 randomly selected programs was performed. Two team members independently reviewed each page and abstracted information from text and images to capture relevant content, including demographics, weight loss, and disclaimers. A systematic review was performed to evaluate the efficacy of these programs by searching MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the mean weight change from each RCT included was abstracted.

RESULTS

Overall, the amount of weight loss portrayed in the testimonials was extreme across all programs examined (range median weight loss 10.7-49.5 kg). Only 10 out of the 24 programs had eligible RCTs. Median weight losses reported in testimonials exceeded that achieved by trial participants. Most programs with RCTs (78%) provided disclaimers stating that the testimonial's results were nontypical and/or gave a range of typical weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight-loss claims within testimonials were higher than results from RCTs. Future studies should examine whether commercial programs' advertising practices influence patients' expectations or satisfaction with modest weight-loss results.

摘要

目的

描述商业减肥项目网站上的减肥宣称及免责声明,并将其与已发表的随机对照试验(RCT)结果进行比较。

方法

对随机选取的24个项目网站上的所有主页和推荐内容进行了内容分析。两名团队成员独立审查每个页面,并从文本和图像中提取信息以获取相关内容,包括人口统计学信息、体重减轻情况和免责声明。通过检索MEDLINE和Cochrane系统评价数据库,对这些项目的疗效进行了系统评价,并提取了纳入的每个RCT的平均体重变化。

结果

总体而言,在所审查的所有项目中,推荐内容中所描述的体重减轻量都非常大(中位数体重减轻范围为10.7 - 49.5千克)。24个项目中只有10个有符合条件的RCT。推荐内容中报告的中位数体重减轻超过了试验参与者所达到的水平。大多数有RCT的项目(78%)提供了免责声明,称推荐结果不具代表性和/或给出了典型体重减轻的范围。

结论

推荐内容中的减肥宣称高于RCT的结果。未来的研究应考察商业项目的广告行为是否会影响患者对适度减肥效果的期望或满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ea/5678966/e35983d386fe/nihms894807f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ea/5678966/e35983d386fe/nihms894807f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ea/5678966/e35983d386fe/nihms894807f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Commercial Programs' Online Weight-Loss Claims Compared to Results from Randomized Controlled Trials.商业减肥项目的在线减重宣称与随机对照试验结果的比较
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Nov;25(11):1885-1893. doi: 10.1002/oby.21959. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
2
Direct comparisons of commercial weight-loss programs on weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure: a systematic review.商业减肥项目对体重、腰围和血压影响的直接比较:一项系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 1;16:460. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3112-z.
3
Benefits of commercial weight-loss programs on blood pressure and lipids: a systematic review.商业减肥计划对血压和血脂的益处:一项系统评价。
Prev Med. 2016 Sep;90:86-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.028. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
4
5
Efficacy of commercial weight-loss programs: an updated systematic review.商业减肥计划的疗效:一项更新的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 7;162(7):501-12. doi: 10.7326/M14-2238.
6
Using synchronous distance education to deliver a weight loss intervention: A randomized trial.利用同步远程教育实施减肥干预:一项随机试验。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Jan;24(1):44-50. doi: 10.1002/oby.21315. Epub 2015 Dec 6.
7
Impact of digital technologies for communicating messages on weight loss maintenance: a systematic literature review.数字技术在传递信息以维持体重减轻方面的影响:系统文献回顾。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;29(2):320-328. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky171.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.减肥手术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13410.
9
Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验中参与者和专业人员偏好影响的概念框架与系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9350.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence-Based Digital Tools for Weight Loss Maintenance: The NoHoW Project.基于证据的体重维持数字工具:NoHoW 项目。
Obes Facts. 2021;14(3):320-333. doi: 10.1159/000515663. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Initial weight loss goals: have they changed and do they matter?最初的减肥目标:它们是否发生了变化,以及它们重要吗?
Obes Sci Pract. 2016 Jun;2(2):154-161. doi: 10.1002/osp4.45. Epub 2016 May 26.
2
Benefits of commercial weight-loss programs on blood pressure and lipids: a systematic review.商业减肥计划对血压和血脂的益处:一项系统评价。
Prev Med. 2016 Sep;90:86-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.028. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
3
Direct comparisons of commercial weight-loss programs on weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure: a systematic review.
商业减肥项目对体重、腰围和血压影响的直接比较:一项系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 1;16:460. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3112-z.
4
Guideline-concordant weight-loss programs in an urban area are uncommon and difficult to identify through the internet.在城市地区,符合指南的减肥项目并不常见,且很难通过互联网找到。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Mar;24(3):583-8. doi: 10.1002/oby.21403. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
5
Weight Loss Expectations and Attrition in Treatment-Seeking Obese Women.寻求治疗的肥胖女性的减肥期望与治疗中断情况
Obes Facts. 2015;8(5):311-8. doi: 10.1159/000441366. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
6
Efficacy of commercial weight-loss programs: an updated systematic review.商业减肥计划的疗效:一项更新的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 7;162(7):501-12. doi: 10.7326/M14-2238.
7
Should providers encourage realistic weight expectations and satisfaction with lost weight in commercial weight loss programs? a preliminary study.在商业减肥项目中,提供者是否应该鼓励对体重有现实的期望并对减重感到满意?一项初步研究。
Springerplus. 2014 Aug 28;3:477. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-477. eCollection 2014.
8
What are cancer centers advertising to the public?: a content analysis.癌症中心向公众宣传什么?:一项内容分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jun 17;160(12):813-20. doi: 10.7326/M14-0500.
9
2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society.2013年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/肥胖学会成人超重和肥胖管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组及肥胖学会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2985-3023. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
Picturing obesity: analyzing the social epidemiology of obesity conveyed through US news media images.描绘肥胖:通过美国新闻媒体图像分析肥胖的社会流行病学。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 May;74(10):1544-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.021. Epub 2012 Mar 6.