Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.; Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; OSTRC, The Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Arthroscopy. 2017 Sep;33(9):1743-1751. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.027.
To evaluate the treatment options, outcomes, and complications associated with proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) instability, which will aim to improve surgical treatment of PTFJ instability and aid surgeons in their decision making and treatment selection.
A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Inclusion criteria were as follows: PTFJ instability treatment techniques, PTFJ surgical outcomes, English language, and human studies. Exclusion criteria were cadaveric studies, animal studies, basic science articles, editorial articles, review articles, and surveys. Furthermore, we excluded studies that did not report patient follow-up time and studies without any patient-reported, clinical or radiographic outcomes at the final follow-up.
The systematic review identified 44 studies (96 patients) after inclusion and exclusion criteria application. For the treatment of PTFJ instability, there were 18 studies (35 patients) describing nonoperative management, 3 studies (4 patients) reported on open reduction, 11 studies (25 patients) reported on fixation, 4 studies (10 patients) that described proximal fibula resection, 3 studies (11 patients) reported on adjustable cortical button repair, 2 studies (3 patients) reported on ligament reconstructions, and 5 (8 patients) studies reported on biceps femoris tendon rerouting. The most (77% to 90%) PTFJ dislocations and instability were anterolateral/unspecified anterior dislocation or instability. Improved outcomes after all forms of PTFJ instability treatment were reported; however, high complication rates were associated with both PTFJ fixation (28%) and fibular head resection (20%).
Improved outcomes can be expected after surgical treatment of PTFJ instability. Proximal tibiofibular ligament reconstruction, specifically biceps rerouting and anatomic graft reconstruction, leads to improved outcomes with low complication rates. Nonoperative treatment is associated with persistent symptoms, whereas both fixation and fibular head resection are associated with high complication rates.
Level IV, systematic review of level IV studies.
评估与胫骨腓骨关节(PTFJ)不稳定相关的治疗选择、结果和并发症,旨在改善 PTFJ 不稳定的手术治疗,并帮助外科医生做出决策和选择治疗方法。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行系统评价。纳入标准如下:PTFJ 不稳定的治疗技术、PTFJ 手术结果、英语和人类研究。排除标准为尸体研究、动物研究、基础科学文章、社论文章、综述文章和调查。此外,我们还排除了未报告患者随访时间的研究和最终随访时没有任何患者报告的临床或影像学结果的研究。
系统评价应用纳入和排除标准后共确定 44 项研究(96 例患者)。对于 PTFJ 不稳定的治疗,有 18 项研究(35 例)描述了非手术治疗,3 项研究(4 例)报告了切开复位,11 项研究(25 例)报告了固定,4 项研究(10 例)描述了腓骨近端切除,3 项研究(11 例)报告了可调皮质按钮修复,2 项研究(3 例)报告了韧带重建,5 项研究(8 例)报告了股二头肌肌腱再转移。最常见的(77%至 90%)PTFJ 脱位和不稳定为前外侧/不明前侧脱位或不稳定。所有形式的 PTFJ 不稳定治疗后都报告了改善的结果;然而,PTFJ 固定(28%)和腓骨头切除(20%)都与较高的并发症发生率相关。
PTFJ 不稳定的手术治疗可获得改善的结果。胫骨腓骨韧带重建,特别是股二头肌再转移和解剖移植物重建,可获得改善的结果,且并发症发生率较低。非手术治疗与持续存在的症状相关,而固定和腓骨头切除均与较高的并发症发生率相关。
IV 级,IV 级研究的系统评价。