Anthropology Department, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1401 University Blvd., HHB 312, Birmingham, AL 35294-1152, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2017 Nov;112:105-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
Previous zooarchaeological analysis at Koobi Fora indicates that Okote Member hominins were the primary agents of bone assemblage formation, gained early access to large and small mammal flesh, and consumed both high- and low-ranked carcass parts. The discovery of additional butchered specimens prompted the re-analysis presented here of three large and well-preserved zooarchaeological assemblages from the Okote member, GaJi14, FwJj14N and FwJj14S, to revisit paleoecological hypotheses about tool-assisted carnivory. Cow and goat limb butchery documenting the skeletal location of cut marks created by skinning, defleshing, and disarticulation was used to build an actualistic model to infer hominin consumption of distinct carcass resources. Archaeological specimens were assigned to early (defleshing limbs), middle (defleshing ribs, viscera, vertebrae, and head) and late (metapodial tendon removal, element disarticulation, long bone fragmentation) carcass consumption stages, and the incidence of these butchery behaviors was examined for specimens and minimum number of element and individual aggregates. Elbow specimens, where traces of defleshing, disarticulation, and percussion co-occur, offer a sequential view of carcass consumption behaviors that is free from fragmentation bias. Classification trees populated with actualistic data were used to identify defleshing and disarticulation cut mark clusters on archaeological elbow portions by their location, cut mark count, median length, and median cross-sectional width. Actualistically-informed configurational analysis offers high-resolution behavioral reconstruction of the butchered sub-assemblage and should be integrated with assemblage-scale zooarchaeological methods. These experiments highlight the bias for detecting butchery traces of early carcass access, because defleshing cut marks are abundant and introduced to dense midshaft portions, whereas disarticulation cut marks are rare and occur on epiphyseal portions, which are often deleted by density-mediated destruction. Butchery trace interpretation across multiple analytical scales confirms a flexible carnivorous paleoecological role for Okote hominins that included primary and secondary access to carcass resources from large and small mammals.
先前在库比福拉(Koobi Fora)进行的动物考古学分析表明,奥科特(Okote)人类成员是骨骼组合形成的主要因素,他们最早获得了大型和小型哺乳动物的肉,并消耗了高等级和低等级的尸体部位。在发现更多的屠宰标本后,促使我们重新分析奥科特成员、GaJi14、FwJj14N 和 FwJj14S 三个大型且保存完好的动物考古组合,以重新审视关于工具辅助肉食的古生态学假设。牛和山羊四肢的屠宰记录了剥皮、去肉和关节分离过程中切割痕迹的骨骼位置,这些记录被用来构建一个实际的模型,以推断人类对不同的尸体资源的消耗。考古标本被分配到早期(去皮四肢)、中期(去皮肋骨、内脏、脊椎和头部)和晚期(跗骨肌腱去除、元素关节分离、长骨破碎)的尸体消耗阶段,并检查了这些屠宰行为在标本和最小元素和个体数量聚集体中的发生率。肘部标本,其中存在去肉、关节分离和敲击的痕迹,提供了一个无碎片偏见的连续观察尸体消耗行为的视角。使用实际数据填充的分类树被用来根据位置、切割痕迹数量、中位数长度和中位数横截面宽度,识别考古肘部部位的去肉和关节分离切割痕迹集群。实际启发式的形态分析为屠宰子组合提供了高分辨率的行为重建,应该与组合规模的动物考古学方法相结合。这些实验突出了检测早期尸体获取的屠宰痕迹的偏见,因为去肉切割痕迹丰富,并且引入了密集的中轴部分,而关节分离切割痕迹很少,并且发生在骺部,骺部通常因密度介导的破坏而被删除。跨多个分析尺度的屠宰痕迹解释证实了奥科特人类具有灵活的肉食古生态作用,包括对大型和小型哺乳动物的尸体资源的主要和次要获取。