Maxfield Steven D, Hatt Sarah R, Leske David A, Jung Jae Ho, Holmes Jonathan M
Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea.
J AAPOS. 2017 Oct;21(5):360-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.07.201. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
To evaluate the associations of clinical and surgical factors with atypical postoperative drift following surgery for consecutive exotropia.
A total of 66 patients with consecutive exotropia (≥10 at distance), after historical surgery for esotropia were retrospectively identified at a tertiary medical center. All patients underwent unilateral lateral rectus recession (on adjustable suture) with medial rectus advancement and/or resection. Immediate postoperative target angle was 4-10 of esotropia at distance, anticipating mild postoperative exodrift. Actual postoperative drift was calculated as change in distance deviation from immediately postadjustment to 6 weeks. Typical drift was defined as 0-9 of exodrift. Excessive exodrift was defined as ≥10. Esodrift was defined as 1 or more. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate for associations with a wide range of clinical and surgical factors.
Overall there was a median exodrift (4, quartiles 0-10). Of the 66 patients, 18 (27%) showed excessive exodrift; 15 (23%), esodrift. In multiple logistic analyses, larger preoperative distance exodeviation was associated with excessive exodrift (P = 0.01), and non-normal medial rectus attachment status (abnormal [stretched scar, pseudo-tendon], attached to pulley, or behind pulley) was associated with esodrift (P = 0.02).
Approximately half of patients show atypical drift following unilateral surgery for consecutive exotropia, with larger preoperative distance exodeviation associated with exodrift and non-normal medial rectus muscle status with esodrift. Knowing these associations may help when counseling patients regarding surgical outcomes.
评估连续性外斜视手术后临床及手术因素与非典型术后漂移的相关性。
在一家三级医疗中心对66例连续性外斜视(远距离斜视度≥10棱镜度)患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者既往有内斜视手术史。所有患者均接受了单侧外直肌后徙(采用可调节缝线)联合内直肌缩短和/或切除术。术后即刻远距离目标斜视度为内斜4-10棱镜度,预期术后会有轻度外漂移。实际术后漂移通过计算从调整后即刻到术后6周远距离斜视度的变化得出。典型漂移定义为外漂移0-9棱镜度。过度外漂移定义为≥10棱镜度。内漂移定义为1棱镜度及以上。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析评估一系列临床及手术因素的相关性。
总体上外漂移的中位数为4棱镜度(四分位数间距为0-10棱镜度)。66例患者中,18例(27%)出现过度外漂移;15例(23%)出现内漂移。在多因素logistic分析中,术前远距离外斜视度较大与过度外漂移相关(P = 0.01),内直肌附着状态异常(异常[拉伸瘢痕、假肌腱]、附着于滑车或位于滑车后方)与内漂移相关(P = 0.02)。
连续性外斜视单侧手术后约一半患者出现非典型漂移,术前远距离外斜视度较大与外漂移相关,内直肌状态异常与内漂移相关。了解这些相关性有助于在向患者咨询手术结果时提供参考。