• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国人社区成员和精神科医生对法医精神病学评估的态度。

Attitudes of Chinese community members and psychiatrists towards forensic psychiatric assessments.

机构信息

Mental Health Institute of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders & National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders. Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.

Waikato Clinical Campus, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2017 Dec;258:283-288. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.069. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.069
PMID:28867405
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes of Chinese community members and psychiatrists towards forensic psychiatric assessments. A questionnaire designed to record attitudes toward the current forensic psychiatric assessment procedures and the disposal of mentally ill offenders was developed and distributed via a mobile App. A total of 134 community members and 132 psychiatrists voluntarily completed the questionnaire. Most of responders agreed that the department of public-security has the right to apply for a forensic psychiatric assessment but should not be held solely by that department. Community members were less significantly confident in the validation of forensic psychiatric opinions than were the psychiatrists. A significantly higher proportion of community members than psychiatrists considered that offenders judged Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD) should be punished as would be sane people. In addition, only a minority of responders supported that NCRMD should not be held criminally responsible. Our results indicate that both groups have comments on the current distribution of right of startup of forensic psychiatric assessments. Compared to psychiatrists, community members have lower confidence in the validation of forensic psychiatric assessment and have stricter attitudes toward the disposal of offenders with psychiatric disorders.

摘要

本研究旨在调查中国社区成员和精神科医生对法医精神病学评估的态度。设计了一份问卷,以记录对当前法医精神病学评估程序和精神障碍罪犯处置的态度,并通过移动应用程序进行分发。共有 134 名社区成员和 132 名精神科医生自愿完成了问卷。大多数受访者认为,公安机关有权申请法医精神病学评估,但不应仅由该部门负责。社区成员对法医精神病学意见的验证信心明显低于精神科医生。与精神科医生相比,更多的社区成员认为,被判定无刑事责任能力的精神障碍罪犯(NCRMD)应该像理智人一样受到惩罚。此外,只有少数受访者支持不应追究 NCRMD 的刑事责任。我们的研究结果表明,两组人员都对当前法医精神病学评估启动权的分配提出了意见。与精神科医生相比,社区成员对法医精神病学评估的验证信心较低,对精神障碍罪犯的处置态度更为严格。

相似文献

1
Attitudes of Chinese community members and psychiatrists towards forensic psychiatric assessments.中国人社区成员和精神科医生对法医精神病学评估的态度。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Dec;258:283-288. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.069. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
2
The comparison of disposal attitudes towards forensic psychiatric patients among police officers, psychiatrists and community members in China.中国警察、精神科医生和社区成员对法医精神病患者处置态度的比较。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2013 Nov;20(8):986-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
3
Forensic psychiatry in Kuwait - characterization of forensic psychiatry patients evaluated over year duration in the only available forensic psychiatry unit.科威特的法医精神病学——对在唯一可用的法医精神病学单位接受为期一年评估的法医精神病学患者的特征描述。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2018 Sep-Oct;60:12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
4
How family members of mentally ill offenders experience the internment measure and (forensic) psychiatric treatment in Belgium: A qualitative study.比利时精神病罪犯的家庭成员如何体验拘留措施及(法医)精神病治疗:一项定性研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017 Sep-Oct;54:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
Profiling Mentally Ill Offenders in Hong Kong: a 5-year Retrospective Review Study.香港精神病罪犯剖析:一项为期5年的回顾性研究。
East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;28(4):114-121.
6
European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on forensic psychiatry: Evidence based assessment and treatment of mentally disordered offenders.欧洲精神病学协会(EPA)法医精神病学指南:精神障碍罪犯的循证评估和治疗。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;51:58-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
7
Attitudes of psychiatrists towards forensic psychiatry: a survey.精神科医生对法医精神病学的态度:一项调查。
Med Sci Law. 2007 Jul;47(3):220-4. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.47.3.220.
8
Factor structure and reliability of the Greek version of Attitudes Towards Mentally Ill Offenders (ΑΤΜΙΟ) Scale in a general population sample.希腊版《对精神病态罪犯的态度量表》(ΑΤΜΙΟ)在一般人群样本中的因子结构和信度。
Psychiatriki. 2024 Mar 28;35(1):66-77. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2023.025. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
9
The effect of gender on the outcome of forensic psychiatric assessment in Sweden: A case vignette study.性别对瑞典法医精神病学评估结果的影响:一项病例 vignette 研究
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2017 Apr;27(2):124-135. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1987. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
10
Shaping Attitudes of Psychiatry Residents Toward Forensic Patients.塑造精神科住院医师对法医鉴定患者的态度。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2016 Dec;44(4):415-421.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and attitudes of physicians toward forensic psychiatry in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯医生对法医精神病学的知识和态度。
Saudi Med J. 2022 Jan;43(1):98-104. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.1.20210669.
2
Changing characteristics of forensic psychiatric patients in Ontario: a population-based study from 1987 to 2012.安大略省法医精神病患者特征变化:1987 年至 2012 年的基于人群研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 May;54(5):627-638. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1619-6. Epub 2018 Oct 27.