University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov-Dec;7(6):e551-e557. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
The results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617, which randomized patients with stages IIIA/IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to definitive chemoradiation therapy to 60 Gy versus 74 Gy, demonstrated a detrimental survival impact with high-dose radiation therapy. We evaluated the impact of changes to a provider-driven clinical pathway (CP) guiding management of NSCLC on practice throughout our cancer center network.
In 2001, we implemented a CP for management of stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC with definitive chemoradiation therapy. In 2013, the CP for NSCLC was amended (amendment 1) to allow a dose range of 60 to 74 Gy. The CP was amended (amendment 2) in January 2016 to specify a dose range of 60 to 70 Gy. Higher doses were considered off-pathway and subject to peer review. Data from decisions entered from 2012 to 2016 were obtained.
From 2012 until publication of RTOG 0617 in February 2015, the median prescription dose was 66 Gy delivered in 1.8 to 2.1 Gy fractions. Doses ≤66 Gy were prescribed for 52% of patients. From February 2015 to September 2016, the median prescription dose was 60 Gy, and 91% of prescription doses were ≤66 Gy. After amendment 2, 99% of decisions were ≤66 Gy. Dose ≤66 Gy was associated with treatment following publication of 0617 (P < .001) and treatment after amendment 2 (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, treatment after amendment 2 was associated with dose ≤66 Gy (odds ratio, 9.9; 95% confidence interval, 5.2-19.0; P < .001). The percentage of lung receiving 20 Gy was lower following publication of 0617 (P < .001). There was no difference in the percentage of heart receiving 40 Gy.
CPs eliminate variations in practice that lead to inferior outcomes. Recognizing that our CP for definitive treatment of patients with locally advanced NSCLC allowed heterogeneous dose prescriptions, we modified the CP based on the publication of RTOG 0617. We found that the CP was a tool to ensure patients receive evidence-based care across a large cancer center network.
放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)0617 的研究结果表明,对于 IIIA/IIIB 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者进行确定性放化疗,给予 60Gy 与 74Gy 的高剂量放疗相比,生存获益受到不利影响。我们评估了一项指导 NSCLC 管理的临床路径(CP)变化对我们癌症中心网络内的实践的影响。
2001 年,我们为 IIIA/IIIB 期 NSCLC 患者的确定性放化疗管理制定了 CP。2013 年,CP 对 NSCLC 进行了修订(修正案 1),允许剂量范围为 60 至 74Gy。2016 年 1 月,CP 再次修订(修正案 2),将剂量范围明确为 60 至 70Gy。较高的剂量被视为偏离路径,并需要经过同行评审。从 2012 年到 2016 年的决策数据被获取。
从 2012 年到 2015 年 2 月 RTOG 0617 发表期间,中位处方剂量为 66Gy,分次剂量为 1.8 至 2.1Gy。52%的患者接受了≤66Gy 的剂量。从 2015 年 2 月到 2016 年 9 月,中位处方剂量为 60Gy,91%的处方剂量≤66Gy。修正案 2 后,99%的决策均≤66Gy。与 0617 发表后(P<0.001)和修正案 2 后(P<0.001)的治疗相比,剂量≤66Gy 与治疗相关。多变量分析显示,修正案 2 后治疗与剂量≤66Gy 相关(比值比,9.9;95%置信区间,5.2-19.0;P<0.001)。与 0617 发表后相比,肺接受 20Gy 的百分比更低(P<0.001)。心脏接受 40Gy 的百分比没有差异。
CP 消除了导致不良结局的实践差异。我们认识到,我们用于局部晚期 NSCLC 确定性治疗的 CP 允许剂量处方存在异质性,因此根据 RTOG 0617 的发表结果对 CP 进行了修改。我们发现,CP 是确保在大型癌症中心网络内为患者提供基于证据的治疗的工具。