Suppr超能文献

使用Amplatzer血管封堵器治疗顽固性手臂水肿患者的血液透析动静脉通路闭塞

Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Access Occlusion Using the Amplatzer Vascular Plug in Patients with Intractable Arm Edema.

作者信息

Filippo Michele Di, Barbarisi Danilo, Ferrara Doriana, Brancaccio Stefania, Del Guercio Luca, Bracale Renata, Capuano Alfredo, Esposito Giovanni, Bracale Umberto Marcello

机构信息

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Nephrology Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Case Rep Nephrol Dial. 2017 Jun 23;7(2):63-72. doi: 10.1159/000477663. eCollection 2017 May-Aug.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Vascular occlusion of hemodialysis arteriovenous access (AVA) using an Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP; St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) is an arising and alternative practice in selected patients; however, few reported cases can be found in the literature. Herein, we report on our experience with endovascular treatment of complicated AVA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 2015 to December 2016, 3 patients at our clinic underwent an occlusion of hemodialysis AVA with 2 different Amplatzer vascular plugs: 2 patients with type II and 1 patient with type IV. Of these, 1 patient was treated for an autologous radiocephalic fistula, the second patient was treated for an autologous brachiocephalic fistula located at the elbow, and the third was, instead, treated for a radiocephalic forearm fistula. The reason for closing the AVA in all patients was due to the presence of dialysis-associated steal syndrome with critical hand ischemia and intractable ipsilateral edema.

RESULTS

All AVAs were treated using an AVP. No plug migration, access revascularization, persistent ischemia, nor other complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

This report suggests that the use of AVP for embolization of complicated AVA is a safe and reasonable alternative to open surgery in selected patients.

摘要

目的

使用Amplatzer血管封堵器(AVP;美国明尼苏达州圣保罗市圣犹达医疗公司)对血液透析动静脉通路(AVA)进行血管封堵是一种新兴的、适用于特定患者的替代方法;然而,文献中报道的病例很少。在此,我们报告我们对复杂AVA进行血管内治疗的经验。

材料与方法

2015年9月至2016年12月,我们诊所的3例患者使用2种不同的Amplatzer血管封堵器对血液透析AVA进行了封堵:2例II型患者和1例IV型患者。其中,1例患者接受了自体桡动脉-头静脉内瘘治疗,第2例患者接受了位于肘部的自体肱动脉-头静脉内瘘治疗,第3例患者接受了桡动脉-头静脉前臂内瘘治疗。所有患者关闭AVA的原因是存在与透析相关的窃血综合征,伴有严重手部缺血和难治性同侧水肿。

结果

所有AVA均使用AVP进行治疗。未观察到封堵器移位、通路再血管化、持续性缺血或其他并发症。

结论

本报告表明,对于特定患者,使用AVP栓塞复杂AVA是一种安全合理的替代开放手术的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab84/5566693/a9c5da8f1170/cnd-0007-0063-g01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验