Department of Biology, University of Virginia, PO Box 400328, Charlottesville, Virginia, 22904, USA.
School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, PO Box 644236, Pullman, Washington, 99164-4236, USA.
Ecology. 2017 Nov;98(11):2930-2939. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2001. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
The reproductive assurance (RA) hypothesis predicts that the ability to autonomously self-fertilize should be favored in environments where a lack of mates or pollinators limits outcross reproduction. Because such limits to outcrossing are predicted to be most severe at range edges, elevated autonomy in peripheral populations is often attributed to RA. We test this hypothesis in 24 populations spanning the range of Campanula americana, including sampling at the range interior and three geographic range edges. We scored autonomous fruit set in a pollinator-free environment and detected clinal variation-autonomy increased linearly from the southern to the northern edge, and from the eastern to the western edge. We then address whether the cline reflects the contemporary pollination environment. We measured population size, plant density, pollinator visitation, outcross pollen limitation and RA in natural populations over two years. Most populations were pollen limited, and those that experienced higher visitation rates by bumblebees had reduced pollen limitation. Reproductive assurance, however, was generally low across populations and was unrelated to pollen limitation or autonomy. Neither pollen limitation nor RA displayed geographic clines. Finally, autonomy was not associated with pollinator visitation rates or mate availability. Thus, the data do not support the RA hypothesis; clinal variation in autonomy is unrelated to the current pollination environment. Therefore, geographic patterns of autonomy are likely the result of historical processes rather than contemporary natural selection for RA.
生殖保证(RA)假说预测,在缺乏配偶或传粉者限制异交繁殖的环境中,应该有利于自主自交的能力。由于这种异交限制预计在分布范围的边缘最为严重,因此外围种群的自主性通常归因于 RA。我们在跨越美国风铃草分布范围的 24 个种群中检验了这一假说,包括在分布范围内部和三个地理分布范围边缘进行采样。我们在没有传粉者的环境中记录了自主结实的情况,并检测到了连续变异——自主性从南部到北部边缘,从东部到西部边缘呈线性增加。然后,我们探讨了这种渐变是否反映了当代的授粉环境。我们在两年内测量了自然种群的种群大小、植物密度、传粉者访问率、异交花粉限制和 RA。大多数种群都受到花粉限制,而那些受到大黄蜂访问率较高的种群花粉限制则较低。然而,生殖保证在整个种群中普遍较低,与花粉限制或自主性无关。花粉限制或 RA 都没有表现出地理渐变。最后,自主性与传粉者访问率或配偶可用性无关。因此,数据不支持 RA 假说;自主性的渐变与当前的授粉环境无关。因此,自主性的地理模式可能是历史过程的结果,而不是对 RA 的当代自然选择的结果。