Department of Substance Use, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway.
Department of Substance Use, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway; Department of Criminology and Sociology of Law, University of Oslo, Norway.
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Dec;50:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Sep 3.
Ecstasy pills with MDMA as the main ingredient were introduced in many European countries in the 1980s, and were often linked to the rave and club scenes. However, use gradually levelled off, in part as a response to increased concerns about possible mental health consequences and fatalities. Extensive use of MDMA now seems to be re-emerging in many countries. In this study, we investigated the cultural and social meaning associated with MDMA use in Oslo, Norway, with an emphasis on how users distinguish MDMA crystals and powder from "old ecstasy pills".
Qualitative in-depth interviews (n=31, 61,3% males) were conducted with young adult party-goers and recreational MDMA/ecstasy users (20-34 years old, mean age 26.2 years).
Research participants emphasised three important perceived differences between the MDMA crystals and ecstasy pills: (i) The effects of MDMA were described as better than ecstasy; (ii) MDMA was regarded as a safer drug; (iii) Users of MDMA crystals were described as more distinct from and less anchored in out-of-fashion rave culture than those using ecstasy. These differences were an important part of the symbolic boundary work MDMA users engaged in when justifying their drug use.
MDMA has re-emerged as an important psychoactive substance in Oslo's club scene. One important reason for this re-emergence seems to be its perceived differentiation from ecstasy pills, even though the active ingredient in both drugs is MDMA. This perceived distinction between MDMA and ecstasy reveals the importance of social and symbolic meanings in relation to psychoactive substance use. Insights from this study can be important in terms of understanding how trends in drug use develop and how certain drugs gain or lose popularity.
含有 MDMA 作为主要成分的摇头丸于 20 世纪 80 年代在许多欧洲国家推出,通常与锐舞和俱乐部场景有关。然而,随着对可能的心理健康后果和死亡人数的担忧增加,使用逐渐减少。现在,MDMA 的广泛使用似乎在许多国家再次出现。在这项研究中,我们调查了挪威奥斯陆与 MDMA 使用相关的文化和社会意义,重点是使用者如何将 MDMA 晶体和粉末与“旧摇头丸”区分开来。
对年轻的派对参与者和娱乐性 MDMA/摇头丸使用者(20-34 岁,平均年龄 26.2 岁)进行了定性深入访谈(n=31,61.3%为男性)。
研究参与者强调了 MDMA 晶体和摇头丸之间的三个重要区别:(i)MDMA 的效果被描述为优于摇头丸;(ii)MDMA 被认为是一种更安全的药物;(iii)MDMA 晶体的使用者被描述为与过时的锐舞文化的区别更大,与使用摇头丸的人相比,他们更不固定在该文化中。这些差异是 MDMA 用户在为自己的药物使用辩护时进行的象征性边界工作的重要组成部分。
MDMA 已重新成为奥斯陆俱乐部场景中的一种重要的精神活性物质。这种重新出现的一个重要原因似乎是它与摇头丸的区别,尽管这两种药物的活性成分都是 MDMA。这种对 MDMA 和摇头丸的区别的认识揭示了社会和符号意义在精神活性物质使用中的重要性。这项研究的见解对于理解药物使用趋势的发展以及某些药物如何获得或失去流行度非常重要。