• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

民主和媒体自由对 1961-2011 年 5 岁以下儿童死亡率的影响。

The impact of democracy and media freedom on under-5 mortality, 1961-2011.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Bilkent University, 06800, Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey; Department of Economics, Hacettepe University, 06800, Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2017 Oct;190:237-246. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.023
PMID:28869904
Abstract

Do democracies produce better health outcomes for children than autocracies? We argue that (1) democratic governments have an incentive to reduce child mortality among low-income families and (2) that media freedom enhances their ability to deliver mortality-reducing resources to the poorest. A panel of 167 countries for the years 1961-2011 is used to test those two theoretical claims. We find that level of democracy is negatively associated with under-5 mortality, and that that negative association is greater in the presence of media freedom. These results are robust to the inclusion of country and year fixed effects, time-varying control variables, and the multiple imputation of missing values.

摘要

民主国家的儿童健康状况是否优于专制国家?我们认为,(1)民主政府有动机降低贫困家庭儿童的死亡率,(2)媒体自由增强了它们向最贫困人口提供降低死亡率资源的能力。我们使用 1961 年至 2011 年期间的 167 个国家的面板数据来检验这两个理论主张。我们发现,民主程度与 5 岁以下儿童死亡率呈负相关,而媒体自由的存在使这种负相关关系更为显著。这些结果在纳入国家和年份固定效应、随时间变化的控制变量以及对缺失值的多重插补后仍然稳健。

相似文献

1
The impact of democracy and media freedom on under-5 mortality, 1961-2011.民主和媒体自由对 1961-2011 年 5 岁以下儿童死亡率的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Oct;190:237-246. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
2
Effect of democratic reforms on child mortality: a synthetic control analysis.民主改革对儿童死亡率的影响:综合控制分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Sep;4(9):e627-32. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30104-8. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
3
Democracy and growth in divided societies: A health-inequality trap?分裂社会中的民主与增长:健康不平等的陷阱?
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.013. Epub 2011 May 17.
4
The resource curse and child mortality, 1961-2011.资源诅咒与儿童死亡率(1961-2011 年)。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;176:142-148. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.038. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
5
The value conflict between freedom and security: Explaining the variation of COVID-19 policies in democracies and autocracies.自由与安全之间的价值冲突:解释民主国家和专制国家 COVID-19 政策的变化。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0274270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274270. eCollection 2022.
6
How democracy alters our view of inequality - and what it means for our health.民主如何改变我们对不平等的看法——以及这对我们的健康意味着什么。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;283:114190. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114190. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
7
Globalization, democracy, and child health in developing countries.全球化、民主与发展中国家儿童健康。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jul;136-137:52-63. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 2.
8
Not all built the same? A comparative study of electoral systems and population health.并非都一样?选举制度和人口健康的比较研究。
Health Place. 2017 Sep;47:90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
9
Politics and population health: Testing the impact of electoral democracy.政治与人口健康:检验选举民主制的影响
Health Place. 2016 Jul;40:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 May 14.
10
A longitudinal ecological study of the influences of political, economic, and health services characteristics on under-five mortality in less-developed countries.纵向生态研究:政治、经济和卫生服务特点对欠发达国家 5 岁以下儿童死亡率的影响。
Health Place. 2013 Sep;23:111-21. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
When do democratic transitions reduce or increase child mortality? Exploring the role of non-violent resistance.民主转型何时会降低或提高儿童死亡率?探索非暴力抵抗的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Dec;314:115459. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115459. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
2
Regional Effects of Maternal Mortality Determinants in Africa and the Middle East: How About Political Risks of Conflicts?非洲和中东地区孕产妇死亡决定因素的区域影响:冲突的政治风险如何?
Front Public Health. 2022 May 16;10:865903. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.865903. eCollection 2022.
3
The power of women: Does increasing women's parliamentary representation reduce intake of sugar-sweetened beverages among children and adolescents?
女性的影响力:增加女性在议会中的代表比例会降低儿童和青少年含糖饮料的摄入量吗?
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Jul;25(7):1928-1938. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022000738. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
4
Public Health, Democracy, and Transition: Global Evidence and Post-Communism.公共卫生、民主与转型:全球证据与后共产主义
Soc Indic Res. 2022;160(1):261-285. doi: 10.1007/s11205-021-02770-z. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
5
Autocratisation and universal health coverage: synthetic control study.威权化与全民健康覆盖:合成控制研究。
BMJ. 2020 Oct 23;371:m4040. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4040.
6
Prevalence, Trends, and Drivers of the Utilization of Unskilled Birth Attendants during Democratic Governance in Nigeria from 1999 to 2018.1999 年至 2018 年尼日利亚民主治理期间非熟练接生员利用的流行率、趋势和驱动因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 6;17(1):372. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010372.
7
Food democracy, health disparities and the New York City fat policy.食品民主、健康差距与纽约市肥胖政策
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Mar;23(4):738-746. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003306. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
8
The relationships between democratic experience, adult health, and cause-specific mortality in 170 countries between 1980 and 2016: an observational analysis.1980 年至 2016 年期间 170 个国家的民主经验、成年人健康与特定病因死亡率之间的关系:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 20;393(10181):1628-1640. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30235-1. Epub 2019 Mar 14.