Tian G J, Li D Y, Yu H B, Dong Y D, Peng Y N, Liu P, Wei Y K, Xue H Z
Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Henan Province People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Sep 1;55(9):671-677. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.09.007.
To investigate the clinical efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) in atrial caval shunting (ACS) for type Ⅱ Budd-Chiari syndrome(BCS). The clinical data of patients underwent ACS for type Ⅱ BCS in the Henan Province People's Hospital from January 2014 to June 2016 were prospectively analyzed.Randomized and single-blind, controlled study was performed among the patients, and all of them underwent ACS and were divided into control group (patients underwent traditional perioperative management) and ERAS group (patients underwent ERAS perioperative management) based on a random number table.Operational and postoperative data, levels of inflammatory cytokines, stress state evaluation and postoperative complications were observed.The comparison between the two groups was evaluated with an independent sample test.The trend analyses for variables were done using repeated measures ANOVA.The count data were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact. Eighty-two patients were screened for eligibility, and allocated into the control group (40 patients) and the ERAS group (42 patients). All patients underwent ACS successfully with no death.Comparison of intraoperative status: operation time, volume of intraoperative blood and number of patients receiving blood transfusion were (211.0±12.9) minutes . (207.7±10.7) minutes, (167.5±28.3) ml . (165.0±28.4) ml and 3 cases . 1 case between the control group and the ERAS group, respectively, showing no difference between the two groups (=0.90, 0.29, χ=0.32, all >0.05). Comparison of postoperative status: time of gastric tube removal, time of catheter removal, time of chest tube, time to flatus, time of food intake, duration of postoperative infusion, duration of postoperative hospital stay and numeric rating scale were (3.7±0.5)days . (0.0±0.0)days, (2.3±0.7)days . (1.4±0.5)days, (3.7±0.7)days . (2.3±0.5)days, (75.2±3.8)hours . (46.6±4.2)hours, (75.7±4.7)hours . (21.4±2.1)hours, (10.0±1.0)days . (5.8±0.9)days, (11.4±1.0)days . (7.8±0.6)days, 2.9±0.4 . 1.9±0.6 between the control group and the ERAS group, respectively, with statistically differences (=35.03, 4.36, 8.10, 22.89, 47.78, 14.75, 14.22, 6.13, all <0.05). Stress state evaluation: the levels of IR were (2.7±0.1) .(2.7±0.1), (8.8±0.7) . (5.2±0.3), (11.0±0.5) . (7.3±0.5), (4.9±0.2) . (3.9±0.1), and the levels of C-reaction protein were (14.6±1.3)mg/L .(14.6±1.1) mg/L, (101.2±13.6) mg/L . (89.5±6.9) mg/L, (62.7±8.6) mg/L . (56.4±8.4) mg/L, (46.4±6.7) mg/L . (40.0±5.6) mg/L from pre-operation to postoperative day 1, 3 and 5 between the control group and the ERAS group, respectively, with statistically significant differences in changing trends(=136.61, 4.97, both <0.05). Comparisons of levels of inflammatory cytokines: the levels of IL-6 were (43.1±2.7) ng/L . (43.6±3.6) ng/L, (135.1±6.4) ng/L . (117.4±5.7) ng/L, (145.4±6.7) ng/L . (128.5±5.5) ng/L, (93.3±3.7) ng/L . (88.0±3.9) ng/L, and the levels of TNF-α were (10.4±0.3)mmol/L . (10.4±0.3) mmol/L, (14.4±0.4) mmol/L . (12.6±0.4) mmol/L, (15.6±0.4) mmol/L . (13.8±0.4) mmol/L, (12.3±0.7) mmol/L . (11.4±0.6) mmol/L from pre-operation to postoperative day 1, 3 and 5 between the control group and the ERAS group, respectively, with statistically significant differences in changing trends (=15.15, 21.45, both <0.05). Comparison of postoperative complications: incidence of complications was 30.0%(12/40) in the control group and 11.9%(5/42) in the ERAS group, and the numbers of patients with nausea and vomiting, respiratory complications and cardiovascular complications were 4, 3, 5 cases in the control group and 3, 1, 1 case in the ERAS group, respectively, showing statistically differences in the incidence of complications(χ=4.08, <0.05). All the 82 patients were followed up for 2 to 22 months (median time, 12 months), no patients received reoperation or re-admitted to the hospital duo to complications. ERAS management in the perioperative period of ACS for BCS is beneficial to postoperative recovery of patients, and can relieve postoperative stress state and inflammatory response, reduce the duration of hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative complications.
探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)在Ⅱ型布加综合征(BCS)腔静脉分流术(ACS)中的临床疗效。前瞻性分析2014年1月至2016年6月在河南省人民医院行ACS治疗Ⅱ型BCS患者的临床资料。对患者进行随机单盲对照研究,所有患者均行ACS,根据随机数字表分为对照组(接受传统围手术期管理的患者)和ERAS组(接受ERAS围手术期管理的患者)。观察手术及术后数据、炎症因子水平、应激状态评估及术后并发症。两组间比较采用独立样本t检验。变量的趋势分析采用重复测量方差分析。计数资料采用χ²检验或Fisher确切概率法分析。筛选出82例符合条件的患者,分为对照组(40例)和ERAS组(42例)。所有患者均成功行ACS,无死亡病例。术中情况比较:对照组与ERAS组的手术时间、术中出血量及输血例数分别为(211.0±12.9)分钟、(207.7±10.7)分钟、(167.5±28.3)ml、(165.0±28.4)ml和3例、1例,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.90、0.29,χ²=0.32,均P>0.05)。术后情况比较:对照组与ERAS组的拔胃管时间、拔尿管时间、拔胸管时间、排气时间、进食时间、术后输液时间、术后住院时间及数字评分量表评分分别为(3.7±0.5)天、(0.0±0.0)天、(2.3±0.7)天、(1.4±0.5)天、(3.7±0.7)天、(2.3±0.5)天、(75.2±3.8)小时、(46.6±4.2)小时、(75.7±4.7)小时、(21.4±2.1)小时、(10.0±1.0)天、(5.8±0.9)天、(11.4±1.0)天、(7.8±0.6)天、2.9±0.4、1.9±0.6,差异均有统计学意义(t=35.03、4.36、8.10、22.89、47.78、14.75、14.22、6.13,均P<0.05)。应激状态评估:对照组与ERAS组术前至术后第1、3、5天的胰岛素抵抗(IR)水平分别为(2.7±0.1)、(2.7±0.1),(8.8±0.7)、(5.2±0.3),(11.0±0.5)、(7.3±0.5),(4.9±0.2)、(3.9±0.1),C反应蛋白水平分别为(14.6±1.3)mg/L、(14.6±1.1)mg/L,(101.2±13.6)mg/L、(89.5±6.9)mg/L,(62.7±8.6)mg/L、(56.4±8.4)mg/L,(46.4±6.7)mg/L、(40.0±5.6)mg/L,变化趋势差异均有统计学意义(F=136.61、4.97,均P<0.05)。炎症因子水平比较:对照组与ERAS组术前至术后第1、3、5天的白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平分别为(43.1±2.7)ng/L、(43.6±3.6)ng/L,(135.1±6.4)ng/L、(117.4±5.7)ng/L,(145.4±6.7)ng/L、(128.5±5.5)ng/L,(93.3±3.7)ng/L、(88.0±3.9)ng/L,肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平分别为(10.4±0.3)mmol/L、(10.4±0.3)mmol/L,(14.4±0.4)mmol/L、(12.6±0.4)mmol/L,(15.6±0.4)mmol/L、(13.8±0.4)mmol/L,(12.3±0.7)mmol/L、(11.4±0.6)mmol/L,变化趋势差异均有统计学意义(F=15.15、21.45,均P<0.05)。术后并发症比较:对照组并发症发生率为30.0%(12/40),ERAS组为11.9%(5/42),对照组恶心呕吐、呼吸并发症及心血管并发症患者分别为4例、3例、5例,ERAS组分别为3例、1例、1例,并发症发生率差异有统计学意义(χ²=4.08,P<0.05)。82例患者均随访2至22个月(中位时间12个月),无患者因并发症再次手术或住院。ERAS管理应用于BCS患者ACS围手术期有利于患者术后恢复,可缓解术后应激状态及炎症反应,缩短住院时间,降低术后并发症发生率。