Tilburg University, The Netherlands; North-West University, South Africa; University of Queensland, Australia.
J Adolesc. 2018 Jan;62:226-229. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
This article focuses on two recurrent themes in the study of acculturation in adolescence that challenge progress of the field. First, we often work with low-dimensional, trait-like models of acculturation that cannot deal with modern types of acculturation that are often characterized by multidimensionality and domain specificity. Second, acculturative change in adolescence is undertheorized and there is a need to integrate developmental tasks and models of acculturation. It is argued that approaches that have been adopted in the study of identity (with their models that range from generalized traits to situated approaches and their adoption of both quantitative and qualitative methods) are highly suitable for the study of acculturation. A more contextualized approach would also facilitate the study of the interaction of contextual conditions and acculturative changes in adolescence.
本文聚焦于青少年跨文化适应研究中两个具有挑战性的主题,这些主题阻碍了该领域的发展。首先,我们经常使用低维、特质样的文化适应模型,这些模型无法处理现代类型的文化适应,后者通常具有多维性和领域特异性。其次,青少年的文化适应变化被理论化,需要整合发展任务和文化适应模型。有人认为,在身份研究中采用的方法(其模型范围从广义特质到情境方法,以及它们同时采用定量和定性方法)非常适合文化适应的研究。更具情境性的方法也将有助于研究青少年时期情境条件和文化适应变化的相互作用。