Suppr超能文献

卡培他滨、吉西他滨和贝伐单抗治疗肉瘤样肾细胞癌的2期试验

Phase 2 Trial of Capecitabine, Gemcitabine, and Bevacizumab in Sarcomatoid Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

作者信息

Maiti Abhishek, Nemati-Shafaee Maryam, Msaouel Pavlos, Pagliaro Lance C, Jonasch Eric, Tannir Nizar M, Shah Amishi Y

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.

Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Aug 10. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.07.028.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with sarcomatoid renal-cell carcinomas (sRCC) have poor outcomes and limited treatment options. Preclinical and clinical data suggest susceptibility to cytotoxic agents and vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapies. We designed a phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine, gemcitabine, and bevacizumab in sRCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic or unresectable sRCC were eligible for inclusion. Patients received oral capecitabine 800 mg/m twice daily on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle, intravenous gemcitabine 900 mg/m on days 1 and 15, and intravenous bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15. Primary end points were progression-free survival and time to treatment failure (TTF). Secondary end points were safety, objective response rate, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were enrolled onto the trial. One patient was excluded from survival analysis and 4 from response analysis as a result of missing data. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-7.7), median TTF was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.4-6.0), and median overall survival was 12 months (95% CI, 10.6-13.4). Objective response rate was 20% (5 partial responses, 1 complete response), and disease control rate was 73%. Thirty-one (91%) of the 34 patients discontinued treatment. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was progressive disease, which occurred in 24 patients (71%). The most common grade 3 toxicity was rash (including hand-foot syndrome) in 24% patients.

CONCLUSION

The combination of capecitabine, gemcitabine, and bevacizumab is an option for patients with sRCC; however, response rates are low. Novel therapies are needed to improve outcomes in patients with sRCC.

摘要

背景

肉瘤样肾细胞癌(sRCC)患者预后较差,治疗选择有限。临床前和临床数据表明其对细胞毒性药物和血管内皮生长因子靶向治疗敏感。我们设计了一项2期试验,以评估卡培他滨、吉西他滨和贝伐单抗治疗sRCC的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

转移性或不可切除的sRCC患者符合纳入标准。患者在28天周期的第1至21天每天口服卡培他滨800mg/m²,分两次服用,在第1天和第15天静脉注射吉西他滨900mg/m²,在第1天和第15天静脉注射贝伐单抗10mg/kg。主要终点为无进展生存期和至治疗失败时间(TTF)。次要终点为安全性、客观缓解率和总生存期。

结果

34例患者入组该试验。由于数据缺失,1例患者被排除在生存分析之外,4例被排除在缓解分析之外。中位无进展生存期为5.5个月(95%置信区间[CI],3.4 - 7.7),中位TTF为4.2个月(95%CI,2.4 - 6.0),中位总生存期为12个月(95%CI,10.6 - 13.4)。客观缓解率为20%(5例部分缓解,1例完全缓解),疾病控制率为73%。34例患者中有31例(91%)停止治疗。治疗中断的最常见原因是疾病进展,24例患者(71%)出现该情况。最常见的3级毒性是24%的患者出现皮疹(包括手足综合征)。

结论

卡培他滨、吉西他滨和贝伐单抗联合治疗是sRCC患者的一种选择;然而,缓解率较低。需要新的治疗方法来改善sRCC患者的预后。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Differentiation.伴肉瘤样分化的嫌色性肾细胞癌
J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2023 Jul 8;10(3):1-8. doi: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v10i3.254. eCollection 2023.
7
Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: biology, natural history and management.肉瘤样肾细胞癌:生物学、自然史与治疗。
Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Dec;17(12):659-678. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-00382-9. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

3
Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.卡博替尼与依维莫司治疗晚期肾细胞癌的疗效对比
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1814-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510016. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
4
Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.纳武单抗与依维莫司治疗晚期肾细胞癌的比较
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1803-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
5
PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Differentiation.具有肉瘤样分化的肾细胞癌中PD-1和PD-L1的表达
Cancer Immunol Res. 2015 Dec;3(12):1303-7. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0150. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验