L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Pubic Affairs, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Booth School of Business, University of Chicago.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Feb;114(2):270-285. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000111. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
The present studies examined the hypothesis that loss of personal significance fuels extremism via the need for cognitive closure. Situations of significance loss-those that make one feel ashamed, humiliated, or demeaned-are inconsistent with the desire for a positive self-image, and instill a sense of uncertainty about the self. Consequently, individuals become motivated to seek certainty and closure that affords the restoration of personal significance. Extremist ideologies should thus increase in appeal, because they promise clear-cut strategies for such restoration. These notions were supported in a series of studies ranging from field surveys of political extremists imprisoned in the Philippines (Study 1) and Sri Lanka (Study 2) to experiments conducted with American samples (Studies 3-4). Implications of these findings are considered for the psychology of extremism, and for approaches to counterradicalization, and deradicalization. (PsycINFO Database Record
本研究检验了这样一种假设,即个人意义的丧失通过对认知封闭的需求来助长极端主义。意义丧失的情况——那些让人感到羞耻、羞辱或贬低的情况——与对积极自我形象的渴望不一致,并让人对自我产生不确定感。因此,个体就会产生寻求确定性和封闭性的动机,以恢复个人意义。极端主义意识形态因此应该更具吸引力,因为它们承诺提供明确的策略来实现这种恢复。这些观点在一系列研究中得到了支持,这些研究包括对菲律宾(研究 1)和斯里兰卡(研究 2)被监禁的政治极端分子的实地调查,以及对美国样本进行的实验(研究 3-4)。这些发现的意义被认为对极端主义心理学以及反激进化和去激进化的方法具有启示意义。