Kuzhuget Rossi, Starodubtsev Vladimir, Ignatenko Pavel, Starodubtseva Alexandra, Voroshilina Olga, Ruzankin Pavel, Karpenko Andrey
a "Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Budget Research Institute of Circulation Pathology" , Ministry for Public Health Care Russian Federation , Novosibirsk , Russian Federation.
b Sobolev Institute of Mathematics SB RAS , Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Brain Inj. 2017;31(13-14):1944-1950. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1347279. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
Objective is to compare the predictive value of stump pressure (SP) and cerebral oximetry (rSO2) levels in the evaluation of ischaemic injury of the cerebrum during clamping of the carotid artery (CCA) without temporary shunt (TS). Methods We included 84 patients with an asymptomatic stenosis (>70%) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under GA. Cerebral ischaemic tolerance (CIT) was determined on the basis of SP, rSO2 and ∆rSO2 (↓rSO2 from baseline) during CCA. The levels of S100 protein (S100) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were measured on each stage of the study. MRI was performed for all patients. Results There were no perioperative strokes and myocardial infarctions during the study. Temporary shutdown of blood flow in CAs during CEA is accompanied by a significant elevation of S100, NSE concentration with their subsequent restoration (three days after surgery). ROC analysis showed that none of the methods for CIT assessment (SP, rSO2 and ∆rSO2) was a valuable predictor of cerebral damage during CEA. Conclusion SP with a threshold value of ≤40 mmHg has an average quality of prediction (AUC = 63). ∆rSO2 of ≥20% and a threshold value of rSO2 ≤ 40% have an unsatisfactory quality of prediction (AUC < 60).
目的是比较在无临时分流(TS)的情况下夹闭颈动脉(CCA)期间,残端压力(SP)和脑氧饱和度(rSO2)水平对大脑缺血性损伤评估的预测价值。方法我们纳入了84例接受全身麻醉下行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的无症状性颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄(>70%)患者。在夹闭CCA期间,根据SP、rSO2和∆rSO2(相对于基线的rSO2下降)来确定脑缺血耐受性(CIT)。在研究的每个阶段测量S100蛋白(S100)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的水平。对所有患者进行了MRI检查。结果研究期间无围手术期卒中及心肌梗死发生。CEA期间CCA血流的临时阻断伴随着S100、NSE浓度的显著升高,随后恢复(术后三天)。ROC分析表明,在CEA期间,CIT评估的任何方法(SP、rSO2和∆rSO2)都不是脑损伤的有效预测指标。结论阈值≤40 mmHg的SP具有中等预测质量(AUC = 63)。≥20%的∆rSO2和阈值≤40%的rSO2具有不满意的预测质量(AUC < 60)。