Furberg C D
Cardiology. 1987;74 Suppl 2:24-31. doi: 10.1159/000174284.
Ventricular arrhythmias are the major cause of death in patients with coronary heart disease. By suppressing the arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic agents have the theoretical potential of preventing sudden arrhythmic deaths. A large number of randomized, controlled clinical trials of these agents have been conducted during the early hospital phase after an acute myocardial infarction as well as after discharge. Included in this review are approximately 20 mortality trials of antiarrhythmic drugs, including beta blockers, which have been conducted in the United States and Australia. Results of the trials of antiarrhythmics reported to date have not demonstrated an effect on patient survival or risk of sudden death. Three possible explanations exist. First, these agents do not improve prognosis, which is contrary to massive evidence from animal, clinical, and epidemiologic studies. Second, drug treatment prolongs life, but benefit has not been observed in the trials. This explanation is plausible, since the completed trials have methodologic limitations. Third, control of ventricular arrhythmias helps some patients but harms others. Larger, properly designed trials are needed to resolve the uncertainty about the value of antiarrhythmics in the prevention of sudden death. The short- and long-term trials of beta blockers have documented an effect on survival. The benefit seems to be explained primarily through a reduction in sudden or instantaneous death. Whether this effect is mediated through a reduction in ventricular ectopies or an elevation of the fibrillation threshold is debated, as is the effect, if any, of beta-2 blockade on the incidence of ventricular fibrillation.
室性心律失常是冠心病患者死亡的主要原因。通过抑制心律失常,抗心律失常药物在理论上具有预防心律失常性猝死的潜力。在急性心肌梗死后的早期住院阶段以及出院后,已经对这些药物进行了大量的随机对照临床试验。本综述纳入了大约20项在美国和澳大利亚进行的抗心律失常药物(包括β受体阻滞剂)的死亡率试验。迄今为止报道的抗心律失常药物试验结果并未显示对患者生存或猝死风险有影响。存在三种可能的解释。第一,这些药物并不能改善预后,这与动物、临床和流行病学研究的大量证据相悖。第二,药物治疗延长了生命,但在试验中未观察到益处。这种解释是合理的,因为已完成的试验存在方法学上的局限性。第三,控制室性心律失常对一些患者有帮助,但对另一些患者有害。需要进行更大规模、设计合理的试验来解决抗心律失常药物在预防猝死方面价值的不确定性。β受体阻滞剂的短期和长期试验已证明对生存有影响。这种益处似乎主要是通过减少猝死或即刻死亡来解释的。这种效果是通过减少室性早搏还是提高颤动阈值来介导的存在争议,β2受体阻滞对室颤发生率的影响(如果有的话)也存在争议。