Quiroga-Garza Alejandro, Valdivia-Balderas Juan Manuel, Trejo-Sánchez Miguel Ángel, Espinosa-Uribe Abraham Guadalupe, Reyes-Hernández Cynthia Guadalupe, Elizondo-Omaña Rodrigo Enrique
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Medicina, Human Anatomy Department, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of Ciu- dad Victoria, "Dr. Norberto Treviño Zapata.
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Aug;63(8):12-21.
Surgical site infections (SSI) are the third most common nosocomial infection, increasing morbidity and mortality rates of patients as well as their costs of care, but longer-term follow up studies and data are limited. Lidocaine, in addition to being a readily available and accessible local anesthetic, is known to have bacteriostatic properties. A prospective, descriptive, controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted among patients scheduled to undergo abdominal sur- gery in the general surgical unit of a Mexican hospital. The purpose of the study was to assess the incidence of SSIs in general and to compare the 30-day postoperative infection outcomes of saline irrigation to saline irrigation followed by 2% lidocaine application before skin closure in wounds grade II to IV per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surgical wound classi cation. All patients received systemic antibiotics before surgery. Eighty-four (84) patients (40 men and 44 women; mean age 49.02 ± 19.9 years, range 18-92 years), 39 in the control and 45 in the experimental group, completed the 30-day follow-up without experiencing nonsurgery-related complications. The overall incidence of SSIs (speci cally, seromas and abscesses) was 17.86%; the incidence of abscess formation was 7.14%. The overall incidence of SSIs in the lidocaine group was 8.89% compared to 28.2% in the saline only group (P = .02); the relative risk was 1.8 (P = .02; 95% CI 1.19-2.74) and 0.45 (P = .02; 95% CI 0.19-1.06) in the saline and lidocaine groups, respectively. Hemoglobin and albumin levels were signi cantly lower in patients who did compared to those who did not develop an SSI (P = .02 and .04, respectively). No signi cant SSI rate differences were seen between patients who did and did not have a drain placed. In patients who developed an abscess, Escherichia coli was the most prevalent bacteria and present in 40% of collected uid. While carefully controlled clinical studies are needed, lidocaine appears to be a viable option to decrease the incidence of SSI if applied as irrigation before wound closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
手术部位感染(SSI)是第三常见的医院感染,会增加患者的发病率和死亡率以及护理成本,但长期随访研究和数据有限。利多卡因除了是一种容易获得且便于使用的局部麻醉剂外,还具有抑菌特性。在墨西哥一家医院普通外科病房计划接受腹部手术的患者中进行了一项前瞻性、描述性、对照、随机临床试验。该研究的目的是总体评估SSI的发生率,并比较按照疾病控制与预防中心手术伤口分类法,II至IV级伤口在皮肤缝合前用生理盐水冲洗与先用生理盐水冲洗再用2%利多卡因冲洗的30天术后感染结果。所有患者在手术前均接受全身抗生素治疗。84名患者(40名男性和44名女性;平均年龄49.02±19.9岁,范围18 - 92岁),39名在对照组,45名在试验组,完成了30天的随访且未出现与手术无关的并发症。SSI(具体为血清肿和脓肿)的总体发生率为17.86%;脓肿形成的发生率为7.14%。利多卡因组SSI的总体发生率为8.89%,而仅用生理盐水组为28.2%(P = 0.02);生理盐水组和利多卡因组的相对风险分别为1.8(P = 0.02;95% CI 1.19 - 2.74)和0.45(P = 0.02;95% CI 0.19 - 1.06)。发生SSI的患者血红蛋白和白蛋白水平显著低于未发生SSI的患者(分别为P = 0.02和0.04)。放置引流管和未放置引流管的患者之间未观察到显著的SSI发生率差异。在发生脓肿的患者中,大肠杆菌是最常见的细菌,在40%的采集液中存在。虽然需要仔细对照的临床研究,但对于接受腹部手术的患者,如果在伤口缝合前用作冲洗液,利多卡因似乎是降低SSI发生率的一个可行选择。