Pareek Manan
Dan Med J. 2017 Sep;64(9).
Traditional cardiovascular risk stratification tools that employ clinical risk factors are limited by their modest discriminative abilities. As such, robust cardiovascular risk assessment, including our understanding of the complex interplay between risk factors, in the primary preventive setting, remains incomplete. Phenotypical heterogeneity may be even greater among subjects with hyperglycemic conditions, i.e., prediabetes and diabetes, which is worrisome, given the dramatic global rise in mean fasting glucose levels, and the strong association with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The unmet need for refinement or restratification of risk based on these conventional prediction models is only emphasized by our entrance into the era of precision medicine. Potential tools for closing these gaps and increasing our understanding of the pathways from risk factors through subclinical changes to manifest disease include echocardiography and circulating biomarkers.
The thesis was based on a series of cross-sectional and prospective observational studies. The study population was derived from the echocardiography subsample (n=1,792) of the Malmö Preventive Project Re-Examination Study (MPP-RES) (2002-2006, n=18,238), a population-based screening program that included inhabitants from Malmö, Sweden, who belonged to prespecified birth cohorts between 1921-1949. Subjects, who underwent echocardiography, were randomly chosen from the three categories defined by base-line FPG, i.e., normal fasting glucose, impaired fasting glucose, and diabetes, including use of anti-diabetic medication. Blood samples for cardiovascular biomarker assessments were drawn at the time of echocardiography and kept frozen until analysis. Outcome data were obtained through national and local registries. The original echocardiography subsample was stratified into patients and apparently healthy subjects, the latter being the focus of this thesis.
FPG influenced the interplay between subclinical echocardiographic abnormalities, circulating biomarkers, and cardiovascular outcomes at multiple stages, in this cohort of apparently healthy, elderly subjects. Newly diagnosed diabetes, but not impaired fasting glucose, was associated with adverse subclinical changes. The associations between structural echocardiographic abnormalities and biomarker concentrations were stronger in subjects with hyperglycemia. NT-proBNP, but not echocardiographic measures or hs-TnT, provided discriminative improvement on top of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. FPG further modified the prognosis re-lated to echocardiographic alterations, but not that predicted by biomarkers. Therefore, FPG should be considered when assessing markers of subclinical cardiovascular alterations.
采用临床危险因素的传统心血管风险分层工具,其鉴别能力有限。因此,在一级预防环境中,全面的心血管风险评估,包括我们对危险因素之间复杂相互作用的理解,仍不完整。在血糖异常的人群中,即糖尿病前期和糖尿病患者中,表型异质性可能更大,鉴于全球空腹血糖平均水平急剧上升,以及与不良心血管结局的强烈关联,这令人担忧。进入精准医学时代,更凸显了基于这些传统预测模型对风险进行细化或重新分层的未满足需求。用于填补这些空白并增进我们对从危险因素到亚临床变化再到显性疾病的发病途径理解的潜在工具包括超声心动图和循环生物标志物。
1)在左室射血分数保留(±50%)的明显健康的老年受试者中,研究较高的空腹血糖(FPG)水平是否与左室质量(LVM)、几何形态、舒张功能以及脑钠肽前体N末端(NT-proBNP)和高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T(hs-TnT)浓度相关;2)研究FPG水平是否改变异常LVM、几何形态、舒张功能障碍、NT-proBNP和hs-TnT在预测心血管发病率和死亡率方面的预后作用;3)确定NT-proBNP和hs-TnT在预测心血管事件发生方面,超出传统危险因素、血糖状态和亚临床超声心动图异常的增量预后价值;4)探讨NT-proBNP和hs-TnT与左室结构和功能的关键超声心动图指标的关联,包括FPG水平的影响。
本论文基于一系列横断面和前瞻性观察性研究。研究人群来自马尔默预防项目复查研究(MPP-RES)(2002 - 2006年,n = 18,238)的超声心动图子样本(n = 1,792),这是一项基于人群的筛查项目,包括来自瑞典马尔默、属于1921 - 1949年预先指定出生队列的居民。接受超声心动图检查的受试者是从根据基线FPG定义的三类人群中随机选取的,即空腹血糖正常、空腹血糖受损和糖尿病,包括使用抗糖尿病药物的人群。在进行超声心动图检查时采集用于心血管生物标志物评估的血样,并冷冻保存直至分析。结局数据通过国家和地方登记处获得。原始超声心动图子样本被分为患者和明显健康的受试者,后者是本论文的重点。
1)糖尿病患者同心性左室肥厚(LVH)、2级或3级舒张功能障碍的患病率更高,hs-TnT浓度更高。空腹血糖受损的受试者NT-proBNP浓度最低。在高血糖受试者中,左室质量指数(LVMI)主要与舒张功能相关;2)左室舒张功能障碍与心血管事件发生风险增加相关,但未提供鉴别改善。同心性LVH和舒张功能障碍在高血糖受试者中与不良预后的相关性更强。高浓度的NT-proBNP和hs-TnT可预测心血管事件发生,FPG无效应修饰作用;3)NT-proBNP而非hs-TnT在传统危险因素、FPG以及LVH和/或舒张功能障碍之外提供了鉴别改善;4)NT-proBNP和hs-TnT与多个超声心动图参数相关,但效应大小一般较小。生物标志物与超声心动图指标之间的关联受高血糖影响。
在这个明显健康的老年受试者队列中,FPG在多个阶段影响亚临床超声心动图异常、循环生物标志物和心血管结局之间的相互作用。新诊断的糖尿病而非空腹血糖受损与不良亚临床变化相关。在高血糖受试者中,超声心动图结构异常与生物标志物浓度之间的关联更强。NT-proBNP而非超声心动图指标或hs-TnT在传统心血管危险因素之上提供了鉴别改善。FPG进一步改变了与超声心动图改变相关的预后,但未改变生物标志物预测的预后。因此,在评估亚临床心血管改变的标志物时应考虑FPG。